Saturday, May 16, 2009

Eeyore's News and view

Missy – A Vignette

“Mother?” asked nine-year-old Missy Banks, “What if my new teacher doesn’t like me?”

Helen Banks was getting Missy ready for the first day of fourth grade. “I’m sure she’ll like you, Missy. What’s not to like?” She hugged her daughter and then put the remaining items into Missy’s pretty pink day pack. The pack matched her sturdy athletic shoes.

“Oh, Mother! You’re so funny!” The laughter faded, and Missy asked her mother another question. “When should I give the teacher my note?”

Helen turned Missy around to face her and put her hands on Missy’s shoulders, looking into her soft brown eyes. “Mrs. Wilson will be very busy this morning. You can wait until I come to pick you up and we’ll show her together. How’s that?”

Missy cheered up. “Teachers don’t like your and Daddy’s letters, Mother. I’m glad you’re going to be with me when I give it to her.”

Again Helen hugged Missy. She couldn’t be more proud of Missy. She hadn’t assumed Helen would giver her teacher the letter. She was prepared to do it herself, but having her mother there made her feel better.

With a last check of Missy’s new school uniform, Helen got her keys from the rack by the back door and said. “Okay, Sweetie. Time to go.”

Missy followed resolutely out to the Subaru wagon. “First days at school are hard.” she told her mother.

Both were silent as Helen headed for the middle school. But Missy saw her friend Julie being dropped off, and hurried to join her, with just a quick good-bye to her mother.

Helen sighed and watched the two girls go into the school, hand in hand. She looked over and saw the two security guards the school had hired and shook her head. Armed guards at school. What was the world coming to?

“Home school, next year, for sure,” Helen said, blinking back tears. They would be in a position to do that by the next school year. Her job the last three years had put them over the top on getting debt free. Jack’s income would keep them going nicely, meeting day-to-day needs, putting money away in life annuities for retirement, and improving their prep stance.

With Missy never completely out of her mind, Helen went about her chores for the day. She got everything done in plenty of time to meet with Missy’s teacher and then take Missy home.

Missy was right about the teacher not liking the note that Missy handed Miss Wilson, with her mother standing behind her after the other children left the classroom.

“These are my instructions if something bad happens at school, Miss Wilson.”

Amy Wilson read the computer printed letter and noted that Both Helen and Joe Banks had signed it.

“This is ridiculous,” Miss Wilson said, upon finishing the note. “School policy…”

“I’ve had the same letter put in Missy’s records in the office. If something happens, and Missy is harmed in any way, because these instructions are disregarded, there will be repercussions.”

“I don’t respond to threats well, Mrs. Banks,” Miss Wilson said. “School policy will be followed. Not the rantings of some hysterical parent.”

Missy had edged around behind her mother slightly as both women’s voices rose slightly.

“It’s not a threat. Just be aware that Missy is very well educated when it comes to possible problems here at school and in the community.”

“She will follow the rules the school board has laid out or she will be suspended. Now, Mrs. Banks, I suggest you take your letter, your child, and leave. Before there are repercussions. I will call on one of the security staff if you don’t leave immediately.”

Helen took the letter in one hand and Missy’s hand in the other and left the classroom and then the building. When they got to the Subaru, Helen looked her precious daughter in the eyes. “Are you all right, Missy?”

There were tears in her eyes, but Missy nodded. “Yes, Mommy,” she said, slipping back to her younger age use of ‘Mommy’ rather than the more grown up Mother she’d been using for the last few months.

“Don’t cry, honey. This isn’t your fault. And now, I’m going to tell you something very important. Okay?”

Missy nodded. “Yes, Mother.” She wiped her eyes and looked at her mother expectantly. “The Principal and Vice-Principle in the office and Miss Wilson all have read the letter. From now on, you don’t have to worry about it. Just follow the rules. If something really bad ever happens, like we’ve talked about, I want you to do whatever your father and I have taught you and ignore the rules.”

“I don’t like not following rules, Mother. It gets me in trouble.”

A slight smile curved Helen’s lips. “Yes, I understand that. So that’s why I want you to follow them. And if Miss Wilson asks you about this in the next few days, you tell her that I told you to follow the rules. You need not mention that you have other instructions if something bad happens. Can you remember to do that?”

“Yes, Mother.” Missy’s voice showed a bit of exasperation at her mother’s doubt that she could remember something that easy.

“Yes, of course you can. And how was Julie?” Helen asked, leaving the subject of following the security rules of the school behind. For now.

Eagerly Missy explained everything that had happened, including renewing acquaintances with her school year best friend, Julie Howards.


That evening, as Helen and her husband got ready for bed, Helen recounted what had happened at school.

“About what we expected,” Joe replied. “Is Missy going to be okay with the double standard?”

I think so,” Helen replied. “She’s a smart cookie. And with the emergency training we involve her in, I think she can differentiate between the normal goings on, and something that requires her to make her own judgments.”

“Let’s just hope she doesn’t ever have to,” Joe replied.


Keeping one more secret wasn’t hard for Missy. She was used to it. Ever since she was little, she’d been instructed not to tell people certain things. Such as the shelter in the basement, and all the food they have in it. And never to tell anyone about the guns her mother and father had. Or about some of the things in her backpack in the special bag. Or the fact that the pack had a Kevlar bullet resistant back panel.

Missy had her very own Get-Home-Bag that she carried in her back-pack. And knew how to use everything it contained.

First there was the laminated ID with her picture, name, home address and telephone number, alternate address and telephone number of her Aunt Jackie and Uncle Jim, with their pictures and names.

Another laminated card, again with her home address and telephone number and parents’ cell phone numbers. There was a list of safe houses if her parents weren’t available, with names, addresses and telephone numbers. It also included the telephone number of a taxi service that Joe and Helen trusted.

A city map with home and relatives’ addresses marked, along with the list of safe houses.

A small coin purse contained a ten dollar bill, a five dollar bill, and five ones, plus coins. The bills were primarily for paying for a taxi. Included was a signed note that offered a reward to get Missy safely to one of the addresses on the laminated cards if she asked for a cab. The change was primarily for vending machines or a pay telephone.

The school didn’t allow children to bring cell phones or she would have a prepaid one. In addition to the money, the packet contained a telephone card so Missy could make calls on any payphone, or regular telephone. She used it at least once a month under supervision so she could remember how. Usually she called her grandmother to say hello.

Two juice boxes, packet of trail mix, one of jerky, and some hard candies provided a little nutrition and much comfort. Two one-liter bottles of water covered hydration needs. A windup flashlight provided light if needed. A space blanket and disposable poncho provided shelter and warmth. A change of underwear, knit cap, and pair of warm gloves in a vacuum sealed bag for cleanliness and compactness was included. A camper’s pack of toilet tissue, individual moist towelettes, a one-ounce bottle of Purell for sanitation if regular bathroom facilities weren’t available.

A couple of band-aids and two larger patch bandages were the only first aid items. Over the counter medicines weren’t permitted by the school. A packet of tissues was included in case of runny noses.

There was a shrill whistle and a small mirror for signaling, and a dust mask and swimming goggles for her to wear if there were dust, smoke, or fumes involved in the emergency.

Like cell phones, lighters and pocket knives were banned from the school, so Missy had to do without those, even though she knew how to use them safely.

Missy had memorized three code words and their uses with help from her mother. One word was used to indicate it was her parents’ instructions, by them or trusted family and friends to give or receive information or pick Missy up, and a second word that meant for her to keep doing what she was doing, primarily meaning stay where she was. A third word that meant Missy was supposed to follow her Get Home Now plan.

Miss Wilson kept a close eye on Missy for a while, but the intelligent, vivacious little girl did nothing out of the ordinary and the letter was soon out of Miss Wilson’s mind. Missy was just another of her students.


That was until three days before Christmas break. Everyone was excited about the upcoming break. The Banks family had plans to spend the time at Helen’s mother’s place in the country.


Helen dropped Missy off, as usual. Missy ran to join the waiting Julie. Helen’s eyes were drawn to one of the security guards. He was at the fence near the swing set, talking to a man in blue jeans and a leather jacket.

Her sense of danger tingled, just slightly, at the sight. There was no tangible reason to be concerned. Especially as the man in the leather jacket turned and walked away. Helen put it out of her mind, thinking about the grocery run she was making next. But that little tingle was still there.

Definitely her mother’s daughter, and well educated by both her parents to be observant of her surroundings at all times, noticed the same thing Helen had. The security guard talking to a stranger. If that had been a student, they would be on their way to detention. But the stranger left, and the guard, George, headed back to where he usually stood during the morning arrival of the students.

The security man George wasn’t one of the students’ favorite people. He was surly and unpleasant. Mike, on the other hand, while maintaining a certain professional distance, would speak pleasantly, nod, and smile. He was an okay guy in the eyes of most of the students and teachers, too.

Missy also noted her teacher when Miss Wilson greeted Missy and Julie as they entered the classroom. She looked drawn, and not very happy. “Are you sick, Miss Wilson?” Missy asked, stopping as Julie continued to her desk.

A wan smile curved Amy Wilson’s lips. She’d become fond of Missy. She was an excellent student. All that trouble over the letter had been a tempest in a tea cup. “No, Missy. I’m not sick, though I do not feel very well. Nothing to concern you.”

“Yes, Miss Wilson. I hope you feel better.”

“I will, I’m sure. Now go ahead and take your seat and get your English book out.”

“Yes, Ma’am.” Missy hurried over to her desk and did as Miss Wilson said, tucking the back pack into the tray under the seat of the combined seat/desk unit. She chatted with Julie for a moment, but the bell rang and everyone in the class went quiet and waited for Miss Wilson to start the class.

Things progressed normally that morning. Missy had forgotten about the man George had been talking to until she saw him outside the schoolyard gate. Mike was nowhere in sight. George started over to the gate and Missy expected George to make him leave. Instead, the two men talked for a moment and Missy saw George point toward where Miss Wilson was standing, talking to Missy’s former third grade teacher, Angela Montague.

It just didn’t seem right, and Missy, taking Julie’s hand to bring her along, ran over to the two teachers monitoring the afternoon recess. “Miss Wilson! Someone is at the gate and George isn’t making them leave.”

“That’s Officer George, Missy,” Angela said, her attention on Missy rather than the gate. But Amy Wilson looked over at the gate. Missy saw her give a little start.

“I’ll go handle this,” Miss Wilson said, striding firmly away, toward the gate.

“You children go play,” Angela said, intending to follow Amy. With the way things were now, the instructions were to always have two people when someone not with the school was on the premises.

Amy drew up short when the man in the leather jacket slapped Amy as soon as she stepped up to him and George. George made no move to stop it, as the man grabbed Amy.

“Everyone! Into the building! Now!” Angela began urging the students inside, with the help of the other teacher on recess duty.

“Where is Mike?” yelled the other teacher, looking around even as he urged the children inside.

Having shot her personal .22 pistol and rifle many times when at the range with her parents, Missy knew what a gunshot sounded like. The sound was much louder without her hearing protection. That just added a bit of impetus to her moves as she ran for the building.

Angela was screaming at the principle, who had come out of the school offices at all the commotion of children running into the building. “Lock down! Lock down! There’s a man with a gun!”

Mr. Chambers hurried back to the office and the lock down siren began to sound. The students were entering their respective classrooms and Julie was about to enter Miss Wilson’s. Missy made a quick decision. Her parents had stressed to her not to be caught with no way out in case of trouble. They were adamantly against the lock down policy of the school.

Missy grabbed Julie’s hand and tugged her away from the door to the classroom. She led Julie to the girls’ bathroom at the end of the hall.

It suddenly got quiet, other than the sound of the siren, as Missy held the door of the bathroom open just slightly and watched the hallway. She jerked back, but then quickly put her eye to the narrow slot of the door opening when George and the man in the leather jacket dragged Miss Wilson into the building and took her into her classroom.

“Come on, Julie! We need to get away!”

“No! We’re in lockdown! We’re supposed to be in our classroom! I’m scared, Missy!”

“So am I, Julie. But we have to be calm. Not panic. My mom and dad tell that to me all the time.”

There were tears in Julie’s eyes. “And I wet my underpants!”

“That’s okay, Julie,” Missy said. Julie was as upset about her accident as she was the rest of the situation.

“Look,” Missy added, letting the bathroom door close. “I have an extra pair. You can wear them.”

“Really?” Julie asked through her sniffles.

Missy nodded and took off her back pack. It took only a moment to get the zip-lock bag out and open. Julie changed in a stall and came back out a bit calmer. “We should go to the room, Missy,” Julie said. “We’ll get in trouble if we don’t.”

The building siren suddenly cut off. But through the crack left when Missy eased open the bathroom door slightly again, the two girls could hear police and fire sirens approaching from the distance.

George came out of Miss Wilson’s classroom. Missy saw that he had his gun out. She eased the door a bit more closed and continued to watch with one eye. She shivered when George opened the front door of the school just slightly and yelled out, we’ll start killing kids in an hour if you don’t bring us a million dollars and a helicopter! You try to rush us and we’ll kill as many kids as we can before you can stop us!”

George quickly backed away from the doors and leaned against a wall, watching the outside activity as not only police and fire vehicles started showing up at the gate, but several personal vehicles, too. The word had already made the rounds.

Suddenly, the man in the leather jacket dragged Miss Wilson out of the classroom. She was whimpering and crying. “There’s two missing, you idiot!” the man half screamed at George.

“Two! But who? Everyone is supposed to go to their classroom when the siren sounds!”

“I don’t care about what they are supposed to do. Two didn’t, in just this classroom. There could be more. Find them. And kill them.”

“Who are they?” George asked Miss Wilson.

She didn’t answer and George slapped her. Missy drew a sharp breath.

Crying, Miss Wilson whispered, “Missy Banks and Julie Howard.”

“Oh, I’m going to have fun with those two before I kill them,” George said. It was barely loud enough for Missy to hear, but she did. Julie didn’t and Missy didn’t tell her what George had said. Missy was old enough to understand what George meant and she was determined that neither she nor Julie would suffer that fate, much less die.

The leather jacket man took Miss Wilson back into the classroom, and George went into the school offices. Suddenly the PA system squealed and George’s voice came over it. “I’m gonna get you two. You know who you are. Come on out and everything will be fine.”

Julie looked at Missy, but Missy just grabbed Julie’s hand in one of hers and pushed open the bathroom door with the other. “Come on! Run!” Missy hissed. She was leading the way toward the outside entrance nearest the bathroom. They were through it and outside.

Missy had a destination in mind. She quickly led Julie to a spot behind the big compost bin the school maintenance people used to compost the grass clippings. Missy looked up with a frown. It had been threatening snow all day. It started coming down hard and the wind picked up.

“I’m cold, Missy!” Julie said after a few moments. “We have to go back inside! We’ll freeze.”

Missy wasn’t feeling the cold. She still had on her jacket from being out for recess. Julie had taken hers off when she changed and hadn’t put it back on. Her training coming back to her, Missy took off her back pack and took out the watch cap, gloves, emergency poncho and the space blanket.

“Here, Julie. Put these on,” Missy said, giving Julie the poncho first. When she had the items on, Missy hugged her close and wrapped the space blanket around them both. Missy kept her head clear so she could hear and watch.

They were in a cul-de-sac, hidden from sight from the school, but also from the police that Missy assumed were out there trying to help. The way out of the cul-de-sac would take them past Miss Wilson’s room’s windows. They couldn’t even crouch down and go under the level of the windows. The windows were almost full height as part of the solar heating system.

Again the PA system sounded. George was not a happy camper. Missy hugged Julie close when he began to explain what he was going to do to them when he found them. Julie started crying again.

Missy dug out juice and the trail mix from her backpack and urged Julie to eat and drink something to calm her down. Missy kept taking peeks around the corner of the compost bin. She saw George at the doors once and jerked her head back. She was ready to explode outward and run if George came out. But when she looked a few moments later, George was gone.

To Julie it seemed like they were there forever, but Missy had a good sense of time and knew they’d only been outside for perhaps twenty minutes. She relaxed just slightly.

When George came around the opposite corner of the compost bin, he caught Missy off guard, though he was actually the most startled. He wasn’t expecting them to be there. He thought they might be in the utility shed where the mowers were.

Missy had thought about that, but didn’t want to be trapped inside another place. She wanted space to run.

When she saw him, Julie screamed and George started. Missy lunged up and shoved George. He went down hard. Missy wasted no time. Grabbing Julie’s hand again, she jerked her up and began running toward the opening of the cul-de-sac. “Run, Julie! Run!” Missy yelled, releasing her hand so they could both pump their arms and run faster.

Missy was the faster of the two girls, but slowed down to let Julie take the lead. She didn’t realize what she heard first, but the sound of the gunshot came immediately after the whistle of the bullet that sailed past Missy’s right ear. She knew that George was shooting at them.

A bullet chipped the brick at the corner of the building as Missy turned the corner. Missy’s heart leaped when she saw the police and firemen and there was her mother right there by the gate, behind the police warning tape.

She saw several policemen raise their weapons, but didn’t hear the shots as she felt a great pain in her back and went tumbling. The last thought she had was, “George shot me!”

It was several minutes before she came to. She immediately recognized the fact that she was in her mother’s arms. “It hurts, Mommy!” Missy cried.

“I know, Sweetie, I know. But you’re okay. The paramedic said the Kevlar panel stopped the bullet. But you have severe blunt trauma. We have to take you to the hospital, just in case there are complications.”

“Is Julie okay? George was shooting at us.”

“She’s fine. Her father has her over by their car. Come on. Let me help you onto the ambulance stretcher. The police shot him. And Miss Wilson’s boyfriend gave up. He’ll be going away for a long time. He really hurt her and some of the kids. They found Mike tied up in the furnace room.”

“Owie, owie, owie!” Missy couldn’t help it. Even as gentle as the paramedics and her mother were, it hurt being picked up and put on the stretcher.

Just as they started to put the stretcher into the ambulance, Missy saw her father. He had tears in his eyes. “Baby, are you all right?” he asked as the paramedics paused.

“I’m okay, Daddy. It hurts. It really hurts. But Momma says I’ll be okay. I’m glad you gave me the back pack, Daddy. It came in really handy.”

They couldn’t help it. Helen and Jack Banks both had to laugh. Through their tears, but they laughed. Their baby was going to be okay.


End ********

Copyright 2009
Jerry D Young
http://frc4u.org/phpbb/index.php?action=articles;sa=view;article=56

They were pushing for an alternative currency a while back it looks like they had planned for this. They wanted everyone to make the argument why going to a metal (like copper or other) was not a good idea, so they same arguments could not be used against them when their currency take precedence. Just my ramblings.
China's yuan 'set to usurp US dollar' as world's reserve currency
The Chinese yuan is preparing to overtake the US dollar as the world's reserve currency, economist Nouriel Roubini has warned.
Professor Roubini, of New York University's Stern business school, believes that while such a major change is some way off, the Chinese government is laying the ground for the yuan's ascendance.
Known as "Dr Doom" for his negative stance, Prof Roubini argues that China is better placed than the US to provide a reserve currency for the 21st century because it has a large current account surplus, focused government and few of the economic worries the US faces.
China will soon want to see the yuan included in the International Monetary Fund's special drawing rights "basket", he warns, as well as seeing it "used as a means of payment in bilateral trade."
Prof Roubini's warning followed the US government's latest economic data that showed producer prices in April experienced their biggest year-on-year drop since 1950, falling 3.7pc.
The number of Americans claiming unemployment benefit for the first time rose by 32,000 to 637,000 in the week to May 9. The increase meant the total number of people claiming benefits stood at to 6.56m, a record high for the 15th consecutive week in a row.
But neither the gloomy data, nor Prof Roubini's verdict on the greenback's future, held back the markets. The Dow Jones traded up 59.89 at 8344.78 in lunchtime trading.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/financialcrisis/5325805/Chinas-yuan-set-to-usurp-US-

Environmental alarms raised over consumer electronics
Charge your iPod, kill a polar bear?
The choice might not be quite that stark, but an energy watchdog is alarmed about the threat to the environment from the soaring electricity needs of gadgets like MP3 players, mobile phones and flat screen TVs.
In a report Wednesday, the Paris-based International Energy Agency estimates new electronic gadgets will triple their energy consumption by 2030 to 1,700 terawatt hours, the equivalent of today's home electricity consumption of the United States and Japan combined.
The world would have to build around 200 new nuclear power plants just to power all the TVs, iPods, PCs and other home electronics expected to be plugged in by 2030, when the global electric bill to power them will rise to $200 billion a year, the IEA said.
Consumer electronics is "the fastest growing area and it's the area with the least amount of policies in place" to control energy efficiency, said Paul Waide, a senior policy analyst at the IEA.
Electronic gadgets already account for about 15 percent of household electric consumption, a share that is rising rapidly as the number of these gadgets multiplies. Last year, the world spent $80 billion on electricity to power all these household electronics, the IEA said.
Most of the increase in consumer electronics will be in developing countries, where economic growth is fastest and ownership rates of gadgets is the lowest, Waide said.
"This will jeopardize efforts to increase energy security and reduce the emission of greenhouse gases" blamed for global warming, the agency said.
Existing technologies could slash gadgets' energy consumption by more than 30 percent at no cost or by more than 50 percent at a small cost, the IEA estimates, meaning total greenhouse gas emissions from households' electronic gadgets could be held stable at around 500 million tons of CO2 per year.
If nothing is done, this figure will double to around 1 billion tons of CO2 per year by 2030, the IEA estimates.
Televisions are one area where much improvement could be made, Waide said.
The IEA estimates the world will soon have 2 billion TVs in use - or an average of 1.3 televisions for every household with electricity. In addition to becoming more numerous, TVs are also getting bigger screens and are being left on for longer each day. The group predicts 5 percent annual increase in energy consumption between 1990 and 2030, just from TVs alone.
Waide said simple measures, such as allowing consumers to regulate the energy consumption of their gadgets according to the features they actually use, should be adopted to counter this growth.
He said governments also need to encourage minimum performance standards and easy-to-read energy labels, so consumers can take energy efficiency into account along with price when buying home electronics
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2009214989_apeugreenergadgets.html

Developments on swine flu worldwide
May 15, 2009 - 2:48am
By The Associated Press
(AP) - Key developments on swine flu outbreaks, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization and government officials:
_Deaths: Global total of 70 _ 64 in Mexico; four in U.S.; one in Canada and one in Costa Rica. Officials said the Canadian, U.S. and Costa Rican victims also had other medical conditions.
_Confirmed cases: Estimated 6,673 in 35 countries, including at least 2,656 in Mexico; 3,352 in 46 U.S. states and the District of Columbia; and 389 in Canada.
_Arizona officials revealed that a woman in her late 40s died last week of what appears to be complications of the new strain of influenza. The woman had been suffering from a lung condition and lab tests confirmed that the woman was infected with the flu strain.
_In an apparent flare-up of the virus in New York City, three schools were closed and an assistant principal was in critical condition. Four students are ill with swine flu and hundreds of kids were sent home with flu symptoms.
_ Malaysia and Peru each reported its first confirmed case. Peru is the fourth South American nation to confirm the virus' presence, joining Argentina, Brazil and Colombia.
_WHO meets in Geneva to discuss key decisions about making a vaccine. Representatives of European Union and Latin American nations meet in Prague to discuss swine flu and other issues.
_Mexico's confirmed cases jumped by 374 on Thursday, but Health Secretary Jose Angel Cordovaz said that with more confirmations, the virus appears less deadly: the deaths now represent 2.4 percent of confirmed cases.
_WHO estimates that up to 2 billion doses of swine flu vaccine could be produced every year, though the first batches wouldn't be available for four to six months.
_The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is currently working on a "seed stock" to make the vaccine, which should be ready in the next couple of weeks.
_A second soldier at Kansas' Fort Riley has been confirmed with being infected with swine flu, the site considered by many historians to be the epicenter of the 1918 flu outbreak.
_Mexico says Peru has agreed to lift its ban on direct flights from Mexico, but three other Latin American nations _ Cuba, Ecuador and Argentina _ still have such measures in place.
_Fidel Castro defends Cuba's decision to suspend direct flights to and from Mexico, saying his island nation is especially vulnerable because it lacks access to medicine and diagnostic equipment.
___
On the Net:
CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu
WHO: http://tinyurl.com/och3eq

Friday, May 15, 2009

Eeyore's News and View

Scary this person is a Supreme Court Justice and sadly it is not the one retiring.
May 04, 2009
Scalia: You Can Invade My Privacy—but I Don't Have to Like It

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia doesn't think you have a right to privacy in most aspects of your life. But he doesn't care to have his own privacy invaded—although he admits it's perfectly legal.
Back in January, Scalia spoke at a privacy conference organized by the Institute of American and Talmudic Law. While his speech wasn't recorded (apparently at his own insistence), one of his remarks was a statement to the effect:
"Every single datum about my life is private? That's silly." Some information should remain private, "but it doesn't include what groceries I buy."
Scalia also said he wasn't bothered by anyone tracking him on the Internet. "I don't find that particularly offensive…I don't find it a secret what I buy, unless it's shameful."
Taking a cue from Scalia's remarks, Fordham Law Professor Joel Reidenberg decided to give the students in his Information Privacy Law class a special assignment: find everything they could about Scalia on the Internet, and compile a dossier on him. Among other findings, students discovered Scalia's home address and home phone number, his wife's personal e-mail address, and his food and entertainment preferences.
Scalia's reaction wasn't surprising. He didn't like having this information published. Said Scalia:
It is not a rare phenomenon that what is legal may also be quite irresponsible. That appears in the First Amendment context all the time. What can be said often should not be said. Prof. Reidenberg's exercise is an example of perfectly legal, abominably poor judgment. Since he was not teaching a course in judgment, I presume he felt no responsibility to display any.
Well, well. Nothing like being dressed down by a Supreme Court justice!
But perhaps Justice Scalia should give the matter some more consideration. Not everything that should remain private, for instance, is shameful. Your bank account transaction data may not be shameful (well, perhaps it is…), but that doesn't mean anyone should be able to view it. Nor is your Social Security number shameful—but it's not a good idea to broadcast it to potential identity thieves.
Still, the most revealing portraits come from not just one or two data points, but the aggregation of volumes of data, all freely available to anyone who cares to gather it. Taken together, this information paints a remarkably detailed portrait of "you." And it's perfectly legal to compile, even if, as the good Justice Scalia reminds us, the person gathering it, or using it, may be exercising "bad judgment."
Copyright © 2009 by Mark Nestmann

http://www.sovereignsociety.com/

Why, unless it is about control
Documents: Paulson forced 9 bank CEOs to take TARP
May 14, 2009 - 9:08am By SARA LEPRO AP Business Writer
NEW YORK (AP) - The chief executives of the country's nine largest banks had no choice but to accept capital infusions from the Treasury Department in October, government documents released Wednesday have confirmed.
Obtained and released by Judicial Watch, a nonpartisan educational foundation, the documents revealed "talking points" used by former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson during the October 13 meeting between federal officials and the executives that stressed the investments would be required "in any circumstance," whether the banks found them appealing or not.
Paulson also told the bankers it would not be prudent to opt out of the program because doing so "would leave you vulnerable and exposed."
It's no secret that some of the banks had to be pressured to participate in the program, with several bank CEOs saying they had been strongly encouraged to take the funds. But the documents are the first proof of the government's insistence.
"These documents show our government exercising unrestrained power over the private sector," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a statement.
A phone call to the Treasury for comment was not immediately returned Thursday morning.
The outcome of that fateful meeting _ which resulted in the government taking direct stakes in the banks through $125 billion in preferred stock purchases _ marked a shift in the government's strategy to fixing the financial system.
The Treasury had first decided to use a chunk of the $700 billion financial bailout package to pay for taking partial ownership stakes in banks, rather than using the money to buy rotten debts from financial institutions. The idea was that the investments would instill confidence in the system and get banks to lend again following the freeze of the credit markets.
The meeting was hosted by Paulson, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair and current Treasury chief Timothy Geithner, who was then president of the New York Fed.
The banks that were initially required to accept the funds were Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co., State Street Corp., Bank of New York Mellon and Bank of America Corp., including the soon-to-be-acquired Merrill Lynch.
Paulson wanted healthy institutions that did not necessarily need capital from the government to participate in the program first to remove any stigma that might be associated with a bailout. He told reporters during a news conference that the intervention was "what we must do to restore confidence in our financial system."
The Treasury has since invested a total of $199.1 billion in more than 550 of the nation's banks, according to government data. Of that amount, $1.16 billion has been returned by 12 institutions.
Several other recipients of the funds, including JPMorgan and American Express Co., have stressed their desire to return the money as soon as possible. The funds have become burdensome for banks due to the increased government scrutiny and limits on compensation that are contingent with the investment.
http://wtop.com/?nid=111&sid=1675743

Gap between Baby Boomers, young minorities grows
The USA is developing a stark generation gap between aging white Baby Boomers and a young, growing minority population, according to U.S. Census data released today.
The minority population increased 2.3% to 104.6 million from mid-2007 to July 1, 2008, or just over one-third of the total population, the Census Bureau reported
Hispanics had the highest growth rate — 3.2% — during the 12 months.
Although immigration has slowed, higher birth rates among Hispanics make them the fastest growing group. Births, rather than immigration, accounted for about two-thirds of the 1.47 million increase in the Hispanic population in 2008, according to KennethJohnson, demographer at the University of New Hampshire's Carsey Institute. In addition, Hispanics are younger, on average, than the overall population. Births among Hispanics outpaced deaths by nearly 10 to one.
Forty-seven percent of children under 5 are minorities, as are 43% of young people under age 20.
"It's a cumulative effect of immigration," says Jeffrey Passel of the Pew Hispanic Center. "We've built up a population of Hispanics, and increasingly they're native born."
As the median age among non-Hispanic whites increases — it's 41.1 compared with 27.7 for Hispanics — so will the racial and ethnic generation gap, demographers say.
"A lot of these Boomers are going to be relying on this younger generation to take care of them in a lot of ways," says Mark Mather of the Population Reference Bureau. "In another generation, this is going to be our workforce that is supporting Social Security."
Orange County, Fla., home of Walt Disney World, is one of six U.S. counties where the population became majority-minority in 2008: more than half the population are in groups other than non-Hispanic whites.
That's "not a surprise" to Orange County Mayor Richard Crotty, who says the county has always been "a snapshot of what America looks like." Nearly 10% of the nation's 3,142 counties have a minority population above 50%.
The demographic shift is most dramatic among "kids under 20," Mather says. "They really are the groups that are driving these changes."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/2009-05-14-census_N.htm

Tincture of LawlessnessObama's Overreaching Economic Policies
By George F. WillThursday, May 14, 2009
Anyone, said T.S. Eliot, could carve a goose, were it not for the bones. And anyone could govern as boldly as his whims decreed, were it not for the skeletal structure that keeps civil society civil -- the rule of law. The Obama administration is bold. It also is careless regarding constitutional values and is acquiring a tincture of lawlessness.
In February, California's Democratic-controlled Legislature, faced with a $42 billion budget deficit, trimmed $74 million (1.4 percent) from one of the state's fastest-growing programs, which provides care for low-income and incapacitated elderly people and which cost the state $5.42 billion last year. The Los Angeles Times
reports that "loose oversight and bureaucratic inertia have allowed fraud to fester."
But the Service Employees International Union collects nearly $5 million a month from 223,000 caregivers who are members. And the Obama administration has told California that unless the $74 million in cuts are rescinded, it will deny the state $6.8 billion in stimulus money.
Such a federal ukase (the word derives from czarist Russia; how appropriate) to a state legislature is a sign of the administration's dependency agenda -- maximizing the number of people and institutions dependent on the federal government. For the first time, neither sales nor property nor income taxes are the largest source of money for state and local governments. The federal government is.
The SEIU says the cuts violate contracts negotiated with counties. California officials say the state required the contracts to contain clauses allowing pay to be reduced if state funding is.
Anyway, the Obama administration, judging by its cavalier disregard of contracts between Chrysler and some of the lenders it sought money from, thinks contracts are written on water. The administration proposes that Chrysler's secured creditors get 28 cents per dollar on the $7 billion owed to them but that the United Auto Workers union get 43 cents per dollar on its $11 billion in claims -- and 55 percent of the company. This, even though the secured creditors' contracts supposedly guaranteed them better standing than the union.
Among Chrysler's lenders, some servile banks that are now dependent on the administration for capital infusions tugged their forelocks and agreed. Some hedge funds among Chrysler's lenders that are not dependent were vilified by the president because they dared to resist his demand that they violate their fiduciary duties to their investors, who include individuals and institutional pension funds.
The Economist
says the administration has "ridden roughshod over [creditors'] legitimate claims over the [automobile companies'] assets. . . . Bankruptcies involve dividing a shrunken pie. But not all claims are equal: some lenders provide cheaper funds to firms in return for a more secure claim over the assets should things go wrong. They rank above other stakeholders, including shareholders and employees. This principle is now being trashed." Tom Lauria, a lawyer representing hedge fund people trashed by the president as the cause of Chrysler's bankruptcy, asked that his clients' names not be published for fear of violence threatened in e-mails to them.
The Troubled Assets Relief Program, which has not yet been used for its supposed purpose (to purchase such assets from banks), has been the instrument of the administration's adventure in the automobile industry. TARP's $700 billion, like much of the supposed "stimulus" money, is a slush fund the executive branch can use as it pleases. This is as lawless as it would be for Congress to say to the IRS: We need $3.5 trillion to run the government next year, so raise it however you wish -- from whomever, at whatever rates you think suitable. Don't bother us with details.
This is not gross, unambiguous lawlessness of the Nixonian sort -- burglaries, abuse of the IRS and FBI, etc. -- but it is uncomfortably close to an abuse of power that perhaps gave Nixon ideas: When in 1962 the steel industry raised prices, President John F. Kennedy had a tantrum and his administration leaked rumors that the IRS would conduct audits of steel executives, and sent FBI agents on predawn visits to the homes of journalists who covered the steel industry, ostensibly to further a legitimate investigation.
The Obama administration's agenda of maximizing dependency involves political favoritism cloaked in the raiment of "economic planning" and "social justice" that somehow produce results superior to what markets produce when freedom allows merit to manifest itself, and incompetence to fail. The administration's central activity -- the political allocation of wealth and opportunity -- is not merely susceptible to corruption, it is corruption.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/13/AR2009051303014_pf.html

Here is an update from the April 2 post
Water Rights and Rain
Wildlife News on Jul 9, 2008
All she wants is the rain water that lands on her roof. She lives with her husband and two children in a solar-powered home in rural San Miguel County. Committed to promoting sustainability, Kris Holstrom grows organic produce year-round, most of which is sold to local restaurants and farmers markets. On a mesa at 9,000 feet elevation, however, water other than precipitation is hard to come by.
So Kris did what thousands of farmers before her have done: She applied for a water right. Except instead of seeking to divert water from a stream, she sought to collect rain that fell upon the roof of her house and greenhouse. To her surprise, the state engineer opposed her application, arguing that other water users already had locked up the right to use the rain. The Colorado Water Court agreed, and Kris was denied the right to store a few barrels of rainwater. If she persisted with rain harvesting, she would be subject to fines of up to $500 per day.
How could this happen?
Like other western states, Colorado water law follows the prior appropriation doctrine, of which the core principle is “first in time, first in right.” The first person to put water to beneficial use and comply with other legal requirements obtains a water right superior to all later claims to that water.
The right to appropriate enshrined in Colorado’s Constitution has been so scrupulously honored that nearly all of the rivers and streams in Colorado are overappropriated, which means there is often not enough water to satisfy all the claims to it. When this happens, senior water-right holders can “call the river” and cut off the flow to those who filed for water rights later, so-called “juniors.”
Overappropriated rivers are not unique to Colorado. Most of the watercourses in the West are fully or overappropriated. Yet other western states allow or even encourage rainwater harvesting. The obstacle for aspiring rainwater harvesters in Colorado is not the state constitution. It speaks only of the right to divert the “unappropriated waters of any natural stream.”
The problem arises because Colorado’s Supreme Court has given an expansive interpretation to the term “natural stream” and coupled that with a presumption that all diffused waters ultimately will migrate to groundwater or surface streams. And because most streams are overappropriated, collecting rainwater is seen as diverting the water of those who already hold rights to it.
How is a roof a “tributary”?
Applying this legal fiction to Kris Holstrom’s effort to grow food at home, the state engineer argued that her roofs were “tributary” to the San Miguel River. Because the San Miguel River is “on call” during the summer months, Kris’s rain catchment would, the state engineer argued, “cause injury to senior water rights.” The court agreed, even though there was no proof that the water dripping from Kris’s roof would ever make it to the river.
If Kris wanted to collect rainwater for her gardens, she’d have to pursue an augmentation plan and convince the state engineer and water court that she could replace 100 percent of the precipitation captured. Not only did she have to return to the stream every drop of rain she collected, she would have to pay for a complex engineering analysis to prove that her augmentation water would return to the stream in a timeframe mimicking natural conditions.
She didn’t even try. “The farm doesn’t make enough money to pay for an engineering analysis,” she said. Indeed, it’s difficult to imagine a situation where it would make financial sense to harvest free rainwater that has to be replaced with another source of water.
The notion that you can’t utilize the rain falling on your roof might be easier to accept if you really were interfering with senior water rights, but in many situations it just isn’t true. In Kris’s case, most of the rain she collected would have evaporated or been transpired by native vegetation long before it ever reached the San Miguel River.
Hardly a drop in the bucket
A recent study commissioned by Douglas County and the Colorado Water Conservation Board has confirmed that very little precipitation that falls on an undeveloped site ever returns to the stream system. The study focused on an area in northwest Douglas County, where the average annual precipitation is 17.5 inches. In dry years, 100 percent of the annual precipitation is lost to evaporation and transpiration by vegetation. In wet years, a maximum of 15 percent of the precipitation returns to the stream system. On average, just 3 percent of annual precipitation ever returns to the stream.
Despite this hydrological reality, Colorado law requires anyone wanting to use rainwater catchment to send to the stream an amount of water equivalent to 100 percent of all precipitation harvested. That is, in effect, a gift to prior appropriators paid for by folks trying to live more sustainably.
An effort to address this problem stalled in the Colorado legislature this past session. A bill by state Sen. Chris Romer, D-Denver, would have allowed rural residents not on a municipal water system to store rainwater in cisterns up to 5,000 gallons. The bill also would have authorized 10 pilot projects where new housing developments could collect rainwater from rooftops and other impermeable surfaces. But even this tepid effort to update water law was sent to committee for further study.
The committee should use this study period to produce a bill that takes a more aggressive approach to water sustainability. The first thing is to make sure the benefits of rainwater harvesting are not dissipated into oversized yards filled with water-guzzling bluegrass. A serious effort would limit harvested rainwater to food production and Xeriscaped yards.
A resource down the drain
Even greater benefits could be achieved by promoting wide-scale rainwater harvesting in developed areas. Traditional land development practices typically direct runoff from roofs and other impervious surfaces to pollutant-laden streets and parking lots, and then toward storm drains.
Both of these problems would be ameliorated if all buildings were equipped to catch rainwater for later use. Additional benefits could be realized if the water collected from rooftops was brought inside for nonpotable uses. Rainwater that would otherwise be lost to evaporation or storm drains could be used in toilets and washing machines, and then sent to the treatment plant, thereby bringing more water into municipal water systems.
Colorado is expecting 3 million new residents by 2035. At the same time, climate change may be conspiring to exacerbate the water woes of all of the states served by the Colorado River. Rainwater harvesting is no panacea to deal with water shortages, but it should be part of a multifaceted approach to a looming crisis.
Fully utilizing precipitation where it falls reduces the demand on other water resources, leaving more water in streams or aquifers. The most important benefit of a legal change stimulating wide-scale rainwater harvesting may be its fostering of a new water ethic. People who make a personal effort to collect and utilize rain are less likely to waste water or tolerate public policies that allow waste by others, such as inefficient irrigation or inappropriate residential landscaping.
When people are maintaining gutters and cisterns to flush their toilets or grow their gardens, they are more likely to appreciate the importance and scarcity of water. They might finally say no to headlong growth that shows no regard for long-term availability of future water supplies.
Colorado should embrace rainwater harvesting. The legal fiction that all rain is tributary to a stream should be abandoned. Others should not be allowed to own the rain that falls on your roof before you can use it for reasonable domestic uses.
http://www.wildlifemanagementpro.com/2008/07/09/water-rights-and-rain/

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Eeyore's News and View

I get sick of hearing about it every 2 or 4 years in which the military votes don't get counted. For what ever reason, sometimes it seems you can't make it up. Postmarks, well dah they are in the middle of the ocean or desert, they can't get them postmarked. Some people are born stupid and some go to college and law school to get it. They are in harms way and you disenfranchise their vote. What a great country we live in.
Report: One-fourth of overseas votes go uncounted
By JIM ABRAMS
WASHINGTON (AP) - One out of every four ballots requested by military personnel and other Americans living overseas for the 2008 election may have gone uncounted, according to findings being released at a Senate hearing Wednesday.
Sen. Charles Schumer, chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, said the study, while providing only a snapshot of voting patterns, "is enough to show that the balloting process for service members is clearly in need of an overhaul."
The committee, working with the Congressional Research Service, surveyed election offices in seven states with high numbers of military personnel: California, Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington and West Virginia.
It said that of 441,000 absentee ballots requested by eligible voters living abroad - mainly active-duty and reserve troops - more than 98,000 were "lost" ballots that were mailed out but never received by election officials. Taking into account 13,500 ballots that were rejected for such reasons as a missing signature or failure to notarize, one-quarter of those requesting a ballot were disenfranchised.
The study found that an additional 11,000 ballots were returned as undeliverable.
Schumer's office said that because a person living abroad must request the absentee ballot and show a clear intention to vote, voter negligence is not thought to be a major factor.
Rather, the New York Democrat said in a statement, there is a chronic problem of military voters being sent a ballot without sufficient time to complete it and send it back. He cited estimates that a ballot can take up to 13 days to reach an overseas voter.
Among the states surveyed, California had 30,000 "lost" votes out of 103,000 ballots mailed out. An additional 3,000 ballots were returned as undeliverable and 4,000 were rejected.
The hearing was to take up possible problems in the Federal Voting Assistance Program, a Pentagon program that handles the election process for military personnel and other overseas voters.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090513/D98573FG0.html

Can't make this stuff up. Save the Fire ants from becoming Zombies, Lets spend a billion dollars and figure out how Global Warming has caused this. Might be another starter story for one of Jerry's novels.
Parasitic flies turn fire ants into zombies
By BILL HANNAbillhanna@star-telegram.com
It sounds like something out of science fiction: zombie fire ants. But it’s all too real.
Fire ants wander aimlessly away from the mound.
Eventually their heads fall off, and they die.
The strange part is that researchers at the University of Texas at Austin and Texas A&M’s AgriLife Extension Service say making "zombies" out of fire ants is a good thing.
"It’s a tool — they’re not going to completely wipe out the fire ant, but it’s a way to control their population," said Scott Ludwig, an integrated pest management specialist with the AgriLife Extension Service in Overton, in East Texas.
The tool is the tiny phorid fly, native to a region of South America where the fire ants in Texas originated. Researchers have learned that there are as many as 23 phorid species along with pathogens that attack fire ants to keep their population and movements under control.
So far, four phorid species have been introduced in Texas.
Wandering aimlessly
The flies "dive-bomb" the fire ants and lay eggs. The maggot that hatches inside the ant eats away at the brain, and the ant starts exhibiting what some might say is zombie-like behavior.
"At some point, the ant gets up and starts wandering," said Rob Plowes, a research associate at UT.
The maggot eventually migrates into the ant’s head, but Plowes said he "wouldn’t use the word 'control’ to describe what is happening. There is no brain left in the ant, and the ant just starts wandering aimlessly. This wandering stage goes on for about two weeks."
About a month after the egg is laid, the ant’s head falls off and the fly emerges ready to attack any foraging ants away from the mound and lay eggs.
Plowes said fire ants are "very aware" of these tiny flies, and it only takes a few to cause the ants to modify their behavior.
"Just one or two flies can control movement or above-ground activity," Plowes said. "It’s kind of like a medieval activity where you’re putting a castle under siege."
New colonies
Researchers began introducing phorid species in Texas in 1999. The first species has traveled all the way from Central and South Texas to the Oklahoma border. This year, UT researchers will add colonies south of the Metroplex at farms and ranches from Stephenville to Overton. It is the fourth species introduced in Texas.
Fire ants cost the Texas economy about $1 billion annually by damaging circuit breakers and other electrical equipment, according to a Texas A&M study. They can also threaten young calves.
Determining whether the phorid flies will work in Texas will take time, perhaps as long as a decade.
"These are very slow acting," Plowes said. "It’s more like a cumulative impact measured across a time frame of years. It’s not an immediate silver bullet impact."
The flies, which are USDA–approved, do not attack native ants or species and have been introduced in other Gulf Coast states, Plowes said. Despite initial concerns, farmers and ranchers have been willing to let researchers use their property to establish colonies. At the Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association in Fort Worth in March, Plowes said they found plenty of volunteers.
Just one or two flies can control movement.  . . . It’s kind of like a medieval activity where you’re putting a castle under siege."
Rob Plowes,
a research associate at UT
http://www.star-telegram.com/804/story/1371092.html

This is a long article but has some very good points about the government (figures lie and lairs figure) And how stupid it is to mandate taking food and using it for fuel (corn) and if you do that it is cheaper and better for the economy to use it to produce electricity then ethanol.
Administration addressing ethanol, climate change
May 5, 2009 - 5:37pm
By H. JOSEF HEBERT
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Obama administration renewed its commitment Tuesday to speed up investments in ethanol and other biofuels while seeking to deflect some environmentalists' claims that huge increases in corn ethanol use will hinder the fight against global warming.
President Barack Obama directed more loan guarantees and economic stimulus money for biofuels research and told the Agriculture Department to find ways to preserve biofuel industry jobs. The recession, as well as lower gasoline prices, has caused some ethanol producers to suffer, including some who have filed for bankruptcy.
Obama said an interagency group also would explore ways to get automakers to produce more cars that run on ethanol and to find ways to make available more ethanol fueling stations. "We must invest in a clean energy economy," Obama said in a statement.
The reassurances to the ethanol industry came as the Environmental Protection Agency made public its initial analysis on what impact the massive expansion of future ethanol use could have on climate change. Rejecting industry and agricultural interests' arguments, it said its rules _ which will take months to develop _ will take into account increased greenhouse gas emissions as more people plant ethanol crops at the expense of forests and other vegetation and land use is influenced worldwide by the demand for biofuels.
When Congress in 2007 required a huge increase in ethanol use _ to as much as 36 billion gallons a year by 2022 _ it also required that ethanol _ whether from corn or cellulosic crops like switchgrass or wood chips _ have less of a "lifecycle" impact on global warming than does gasoline. It set the threshold at 20 percent climate-pollution improvement for corn ethanol and 60 percent for cellulosic ethanol, although ethanol made from facilities already operating would be exempt.
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said the analysis shows corn ethanol emitting 16 percent less greenhouse gases than gasoline, even taking into account global future land-use changes.
But that's true in only one of the scenarios the EPA examined; another showed corn ethanol would account for 5 percent more greenhouse gases than gasoline. The scenario Jackson cited assumes future environmental benefits over a period of 100 years will more than pay back the initial increase in greenhouse gases from land-use changes; the second assumes a shorter payback period of 30 years.
Frank O'Donnell, president of the advocacy group Clean Air Watch, said the Obama administration was "walking a tightrope" to try to reconcile the expansion of corn ethanol with its determination to aggressively address climate change. He called the assumption of a 100-year ethanol payback to make up for early greenhouse emission increases "nothing but an accounting trick to make corn ethanol look better."
But environmentalists also praised the EPA for making clear it will take into account worldwide land-use changes in assessing ethanol's climate impacts. "The devil is always in the details, but we're pleased that the EPA proposed rules that would require all global warming pollution from biofuels to be taken into account," said Kate McMahon of Friends of the Earth.
The ethanol industry and farm-state members of Congress had wanted only a comparison of direct emissions, which show ethanol as the clear winner, but welcomed the EPA's promise to examine the issue further.
"There is currently no scientific agreement or certainty to quantify domestically produced ethanol impacts on land-use change," argued Roger Johnson, president of the National Farmers Union, responding to the EPA assessment.
Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said he was "skeptical about the science" about the indirect land-use impacts of ethanol on climate change, but that he is pleased the EPA "recognizes the need for a thorough analysis and review of this issue prior to any final decision." Jackson said that as the EPA develops its regulation it will seek out peer-reviewed scientific views on the issue and make its final determination "based on the best science available."
On the Net:
Environmental Protection Agency:
http://www.epa.gov
Renewable Fuels Association: http://www.rfa.org
Agriculture Department: http://www.usda.gov
http://wtop.com/?sid=1667265&nid=116

Swine Flu May Be Human Error; WHO Investigates Claim
May 13 (Bloomberg) -- The World Health Organization is investigating a claim by an Australian researcher that the swine flu virus circling the globe may have been created as a result of human error.
Adrian Gibbs, 75, who collaborated on research that led to the development of Roche Holding AG’s Tamiflu drug, said in an interview that he intends to publish a report suggesting the new strain may have accidentally evolved in eggs scientists use to grow viruses and drugmakers use to make vaccines. Gibbs said he came to his conclusion as part of an effort to trace the virus’s origins by analyzing its genetic blueprint.
“One of the simplest explanations is that it’s a laboratory escape,” Gibbs said in an interview with Bloomberg Television today. “But there are lots of others.”
The World Health Organization received the study last weekend and is reviewing it, Keiji Fukuda, the agency’s assistant director-general of health security and environment, said in an interview May 11. Gibbs, who has studied germ evolution for four decades, is one of the first scientists to analyze the genetic makeup of the virus that was identified three weeks ago in Mexico and threatens to touch off the first flu pandemic since 1968.
A virus that resulted from lab experimentation or vaccine production may indicate a greater need for security, Fukuda said. By pinpointing the source of the virus, scientists also may better understand the microbe’s potential for spreading and causing illness, Gibbs said.
Possible Mistake
“The sooner we get to grips with where it’s come from, the safer things might become,” Gibbs said by phone from Canberra yesterday. “It could be a mistake” that occurred at a vaccine production facility or the virus could have jumped from a pig to another mammal or a bird before reaching humans, he said.
Gibbs and two colleagues analyzed the publicly available sequences of hundreds of amino acids coded by each of the flu virus’s eight genes. He said he aims to submit his three-page paper today for publication in a medical journal.
“You really want a very sober assessment” of the science behind the claim, Fukuda said May 11 at the WHO’s Geneva headquarters.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta has received the report and has decided there is no evidence to support Gibbs’s conclusion, said Nancy Cox, director of the agency’s influenza division. She said since researchers don’t have samples of swine flu viruses from South America and Africa, where the new strain may have evolved, those regions can’t be ruled out as natural sources for the new flu.
No Evidence
“We are interested in the origins of this new influenza virus,” Cox said. “But contrary to what the author has found, when we do the comparisons that are most relevant, there is no evidence that this virus was derived by passage in eggs.”
The WHO’s collaborative influenza research centers, which includes the CDC, and sites in Memphis, Melbourne, London and Tokyo, were asked by the international health agency to review the study over the weekend, Fukuda said. The request was extended to scientists at the Food and Agriculture Organization in Rome, the World Organization for Animal Health in Paris, as well as the WHO’s influenza network, he said.
“My guess is that the picture should be a lot clearer over the next few days,” Fukuda said. “We have asked a lot of people to look at this.”
Virus Expert
Gibbs wrote or co-authored more than 250 scientific publications on viruses during his 39-year career at the Australian National University in Canberra, according to biographical information on the university’s Web site.
Swine flu has infected 5,251 people in 30 countries so far, killing 61, according to WHO data. Scientists are trying to determine whether the virus will mutate and become more deadly if it spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and back. Flu pandemics occur when a strain of the disease to which few people have immunity evolves and spreads.
Gibbs said his analysis supports research by scientists including Richard Webby, a virologist at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, who found the new strain is the product of two distinct lineages of influenza that have circulated among swine in North America and Europe for more than a decade.
In addition, Gibbs said his research found the rate of genetic mutation in the new virus was about three times faster than that of the most closely related viruses found in pigs, suggesting it evolved outside of swine.
Gene Evolution
“Whatever speeded up the evolution of these genes happened at least seven or eight years ago, so one wonders, why hasn’t it been found?” Gibbs said today.
Some scientists have speculated that the 1977 Russian flu, the most recent global outbreak, began when a virus escaped from a laboratory.
Identifying the source of new flu viruses is difficult without finding the exact strain in an animal or bird “reservoir,” said Jennifer McKimm-Breschkin, a virologist at the Commonwealth Science and Industrial Research Organization in Melbourne.
“If you can’t find an exact match, the best you can do is compare sequences,” she said. “Similarities may give an indication of a possible source, but this remains theoretical.”
The World Organization for Animal Health, which represents chief veterinary officers from 174 countries, received the Gibbs paper and is working with the WHO on an assessment, said Maria Zampaglione, a spokeswoman.
Genetic Patterns
The WHO wants to know whether any evidence that the virus may have been developed in a laboratory can be corroborated and whether there are other explanations for its particular genetic patterns, according to Fukuda.
“These things have to be dealt with straight on,” he said. “If someone makes a hypothesis, then you test it and you let scientific process take its course.”
Gibbs said he has no evidence that the swine-derived virus was a deliberate, man-made product.
“I don’t think it could be a malignant thing,” he said. “It’s much more likely that some random thing has put these two viruses together.”
Gibbs, who spent most of his academic career studying plant viruses, said his major contribution to the study of influenza occurred in 1975, while collaborating with scientists Graeme Laver and Robert Webster in research that led to the development of the anti-flu medicines Tamiflu and Relenza, made by GlaxoSmithKline Plc.
Bird Poo
“We were out on one of the Barrier Reef islands, off Australia, catching birds for the flu in them, and I happened to be the guy who caught the best,” Gibbs said. The bird he got “yielded the poo from which was isolated the influenza isolate strain from which all the work on Tamiflu and Relenza started.”
Gibbs, who says he studies the evolution of flu viruses as a “retirement hobby,” expects his research to be challenged by other scientists.
“This is how science progresses,” he said. “Somebody comes up with a wild idea, and then they all pounce on it and kick you to death, and then you start off on another silly idea.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=afrdATVXPEAk&refer=worldwide

WHO confirms flu spreads to Cuba, Finland, Thailand
* H1N1 strain infects 5,728 people in 33 countries
* WHO confirms flu strain reaches Cuba, Finland, Thailand
* More cases in Spain, Britain, Panama, Guatemala, Colombia
GENEVA (Reuters) - H1N1 flu has now reached Cuba, Finland, and Thailand, with nearly 6,000 people infected in 33 countries, the World Health Organization said Wednesday.
In its latest tally, which lags national reports but is considered more reliable, the WHO said the number of infections has also risen in several countries including Spain, Britain, Panama, Guatemala, and Colombia.
The recently discovered virus has killed at least 56 people in Mexico, three people in the United States, and one each in Canada and Costa Rica.
WHO Director-General Margaret Chan has raised the flu alert level to 5 out of 6 as a result of its spread beyond the disease epicenter Mexico, signaling that a pandemic is imminent.
She is looking for evidence the hybrid strain is spreading in sustained way in communities outside of the Americas before raising that alert to 6 and declaring a pandemic is under way.
According to the latest WHO count, Spain has 98 confirmed cases and Britain has 68.
While most of those infections have been deemed "imported" cases as a result of people traveling to Mexico, or being in close contact with those who had, WHO experts are watching both countries closely for signs the virus has taken hold in Europe.
North America continues to have the largest number of confirmed H1N1 infections worldwide. Mexico has 2,059 cases confirmed in WHO labs, the United States has 3,009, Canada has 358, and Costa Rica has eight.
Other countries have the following number of WHO-confirmed flu cases without deaths: Argentina (1), Australia (1), Austria (1), Brazil (8), Britain (68), China (3, comprising 1 in Hong and 2 in mainland China), Colombia (6), Cuba (1), Denmark (1), El Salvador (4), Finland (2), France (13), Germany (12), Guatemala (3), Ireland (1), Israel (7), Italy (9), Japan (4), Netherlands (3), New Zealand (7), Norway (2), Panama (29), Poland (1), Portugal (1), South Korea (3), Spain (98), Sweden (2), Switzerland (1) and Thailand (2).
(For a WHO map of the flu spread worldwide see:
www.who.int/csr/don/h1n1_20090513_0600.jpg)
http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-SwineFlu/idUSTRE54C2XH20090513

Scientist arrested for smuggling vials used in Ebola research into US
A Canadian scientist has been arrested for smuggling 22 vials stolen from Canada's National Microbiology Lab, used in Ebola and HIV research, into the United States, Canadian and US officials said Wednesday.
Konan Michel Yao, 42, "was taken into custody" while crossing the border from Manitoba province into the western US state of North Dakota on May 5, said a spokeswoman for the Public Health Agency of Canada, which operates the lab.
According to US prosecutor Lynn Jordheim, Yao was detained for carrying unidentified biological materials in vials wrapped in aluminium foil inside a glove and packaged in a plastic bag, along with electrical wires, in the trunk of his car.
Yao said in an affidavit he stole the vials, described as research vectors, from the Winnipeg lab on his last day of work there on January 21.
He told US border guards he was taking them to his new job with the National Institutes of Health at the Biodefense Research Laboratory in Bethesda, Maryland.
US authorities feared their contents could pose a terrorist threat. But tests later showed "they are not hazardous," said Jordheim.
"This turned out not to be a terrorism-related case," he said by telephone from North Dakota. "It appears to be exactly as he (Yao) said. However, he still faces possible charges for smuggling the vials into the United States."
Yao, meanwhile, remains in US custody after waiving his right to bail and preliminary hearings, as he awaits a possible grand jury indictment for smuggling, he said.
A Public Health Agency of Canada spokeswoman told AFP Yao "was working on vaccines for the Ebola virus and HIV, among other things."
"But he only had access to harmless and non-infectious materials, similar to what you'd find in a hospital or university lab. He did not have access to dangerous materials."
The Ivory Coast-born scientist is said to have studied at Laval University in Quebec and briefly worked at the University of Manitoba's plant sciences department.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?
id=CNG.1eb625e36e305c62ccc14e75288e023d.6f1&show_article=1

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Eeyore's News and View

Annual report due for Social Security and Medicare
May 12, 2009 - 11:26am
WASHINGTON (AP) - The financial health of the government's two biggest benefit programs may have slipped over the past year, reflecting the deep recession that has already bitten into other areas of the budget.
The trustees for Social Security and Medicare are scheduled to provide their annual report on the finances of both programs on Tuesday. In advance of the release, many private analysts said they expected both programs could run out of cash sooner than last predicted.
A year ago, the trustees projected that the Social Security trust fund would start paying out more in benefits than it collects in taxes in 2017 and that the trust fund would be depleted in 2041.
For the Medicare trust fund, which pays for hospital care, the situation was more urgent. It was projected to start paying more in benefits than it collects in taxes within a year, and the trustees forecast that it would be depleted by 2019.
But many analysts said the worst recession in decades will produce a bleaker forecast for both Social Security and Medicare in the new trustees' report. The downturn has resulted in a loss of 5.7 million payroll jobs since it began in December 2007 and an unemployment rate that hit a 25-year high of 8.9 percent in April.
Fewer people working means less being paid into the trust funds for Social Security and Medicare.
The Congressional Budget Office recently projected that Social Security will collect just $3 billion more in 2010 than it will pay out in benefits. A year ago, the CBO had projected that Social Security would have a much higher $86 billion cash surplus for the 2010 budget year, which begins Oct. 1. The difference in the two estimates is the result of the recession.
While the smaller surplus will not have any impact on Social Security benefit payments, the government will need to borrow more at a time when the federal deficit is already exploding because of the recession and the billions of dollars being spent to prop up a shaky banking system.
For years, the Social Security trust fund has taken in more than it spent on benefits, resulting in a cushion of billions of dollars that the government could spend on other programs while giving the trust fund an IOU.
Even with the big drop in the Social Security surplus, Medicare's condition is more precarious, reflecting the pressures from soaring health care costs as well as the drop in tax collections.
For that reason, President Barack Obama is expected to focus on Medicare before he addresses Social Security.
Obama on Monday praised a pledge by the health care industry to achieve $2 trillion in savings on health care costs over the next decade, but it was unclear how much help those pledges would be in achieving Obama's goal of extending coverage to some 50 million uninsured Americans. The administration is pushing Congress to pass legislation in this area this year, preferring to tackle health care before Social Security.
The trustees report is still expected to set off a heated debate over the government's two large benefit programs, with critics saying it will highlight the failure of the Obama administration to take on the most serious problems in the budget _ soaring entitlement spending, before the retirement of 78 million baby boomers makes the problems even worse.
The administration on Monday revised its deficit forecasts upward to project an imbalance this year of $1.84 trillion, four times last year's record deficit, and said the deficits will remain above $500 billion every year over the next decade.
http://www.wtopnews.com/?sid=1673971&nid=111


Swine flu spreading too fast to count, CDC says
Confirmed cases are only the ‘tip of the iceberg,’ health official says
Swine flu is spreading so far and fast in the U.S. that state health officials may soon stop counting individual cases, a federal health official said Monday.
The novel H1N1 virus accounted for 40 percent of flu viruses logged in the U.S. in the past week and helped propel an uptick in overall flu-like illnesses, said Dr. Anne Schuchat, a deputy director with the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
“I think the cases we’re confirming are the tip of the iceberg here,” Schuchat said in a press briefing Monday.
The CDC has confirmed more than 2,000 cases in 43 states and Washington D.C., with 94 hospitalizations and three deaths. Another 700 cases are suspected. Although the flu is spreading quickly, it remains relatively mild in the U.S., say health officials.
“They tell us for sure this virus is circulating throughout the United States and it’s likely to be in every state,” Schuchat said, adding: “It’s a time when we really need to guard against complacency as we move to a new normal.”
The CDC has started tracking the novel virus using the surveillance system used for seasonal influenza, called FluView.
Because many states did not report cases over the past weekend, Schuchat said she expects a big jump in cases to be reported Tuesday.
So far, three people in the U.S. have died from complications of swine flu. On Saturday, Washington state health officials reported the death of a man in his 30s. America’s other two swine flu deaths — a toddler and a pregnant woman — each suffered from several other illnesses when they were infected with the virus, according to a study released Thursday.
Health officials said the Washington victim had underlying heart conditions and viral pneumonia when he died Thursday from what appeared to be complications from swine flu.
“We’re working with local and federal partners to track this outbreak,” said Washington State Secretary of Health Mary Selecky.
The man was not further identified. He began showing symptoms on April 30, and was treated with anti-viral medication. Dr. Gary Goldbaum, Snohomish Health District medical director, said medical officials hadn’t been able to isolate any “risk factors” for the man to identify where he might have been exposed.
Neighboring Canada reported its first death from swine flu on Friday — a woman who was in her 30s. Alberta's chief medical officer says the woman from northern Alberta and did not travel recently. He says she also had other medical conditions. Dr. Andre Corriveau made the announcement at a news conference Friday.
The report by the CDC presented a clearer picture of the complicated medical situations faced by those who have gotten swine flu and had the most serious cases so far.
The Mexican toddler had a chronic muscle weakness called myasthenia gravis, a heart defect, a swallowing problem and lack of oxygen. Little Miguel Tejada Vazquez fell ill and died during a family visit to Texas.
The pregnant woman, Judy Trunnell, 33, was hospitalized for two weeks until she died Tuesday. The teacher was in a coma, and her baby girl was delivered by cesarean section. According to the report, she had asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, a skin condition called psoriasis and was 35 weeks pregnant.
People with chronic illnesses are at greatest risk for severe illness from the flu, along with the elderly and young children. So far, most of those with the swine flu in the U.S. and Mexico have been young adults.
“We’re still learning about what patients are most at risk” from the new virus, said Dr. Fatima Dawood, a CDC epidemiologist.
The CDC report released by the New England Journal of Medicine also provided more detailed information on 22 people hospitalized with swine flu. Nine had chronic medical conditions, including the two who died and a 25-year-old man with Down syndrome and a congenital heart disease. Five of the patients had asthma alone.
President Barack Obama said Friday that public health agencies must reach all corners of the nation when providing information on matters such as swine flu.
The president dropped by a town hall-style meeting at the White House co-sponsored by the Spanish-language media company Univision.
He said, "we're all in this together. We're one country, we're one community. When one person gets sick, it has the potential of making us all sick."
‘We’re still learning’
Last week, the CDC also described the symptoms experienced by Americans with swine flu. About 90 percent reported fever, 84 percent reported cough and 61 percent reported a sore throat — all similar to what’s seen with seasonal flu. But about one in four cases have also involved either vomiting or diarrhea, which is not typical for the normal flu bug.
It’s possible the virus is spreading not only through coughed and sneezed droplets — as with seasonal flu — but also through feces-contaminated hands, said Dawood.
“This is a new virus and we’re still learning how transmission occurs,” she said.
About 10 percent of the Americans who got swine flu had traveled to Mexico and likely picked up the infection there.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30398682/

The King of Stupid acts, the US is doing, it will kill us and the econmoy soon. Cussword, cussword our politicians are so stupid.
US to borrow 46 cents for every dollar spent
WASHINGTON (AP) - The government will have to borrow nearly 50 cents for every dollar it spends this year, exploding the record federal deficit past $1.8 trillion under new White House estimates. Budget office figures released Monday would add $89 billion to the 2009 red ink - increasing it to more than four times last year's all-time high as the government hands out billions more than expected for people who have lost jobs and takes in less tax revenue from people and companies making less money.
The unprecedented deficit figures flow from the deep recession, the Wall Street bailout and the cost of President Barack Obama's economic stimulus bill - as well as a seemingly embedded structural imbalance between what the government spends and what it takes in.
As the economy performs worse than expected, the deficit for the 2010 budget year beginning in October will worsen by $87 billion to $1.3 trillion, the White House says. The deterioration reflects lower tax revenues and higher costs for bank failures, unemployment benefits and food stamps.
Just a few days ago, Obama touted an administration plan to cut $17 billion in wasteful or duplicative programs from the budget next year. The erosion in the deficit announced Monday is five times the size of those savings.
For the current year, the government would borrow 46 cents for every dollar it takes to run the government under the administration's plan. In 2010, it would borrow 35 cents for every dollar spent.
"The deficits ... are driven in large part by the economic crisis inherited by this administration," budget director Peter Orszag wrote in a blog entry on Monday.
The developments come as the White House completes the official release of its $3.6 trillion budget for 2010, adding detail to some of its tax proposals and ideas for producing health care savings. The White House budget is a recommendation to Congress that represents Obama's fiscal and policy vision for the next decade.
Annual deficits would never dip below $500 billion and would total $7.1 trillion over 2010-2019. Even those dismal figures rely on economic projections that are significantly more optimistic - just a 1.2 percent decline in gross domestic product this year and a 3.2 percent growth rate for 2010 - than those of private sector economists and the Congressional Budget Office.
As a percentage of the economy, the measure economists say is most important, the deficit would be 12.9 percent of GDP this year, the biggest since World War II. It would drop to 8.5 percent of GDP in 2010.
In the past three decades, deficits in the range of 4 percent of GDP have caused Congress and previous administrations to launch efforts to narrow the gap. The White House predicts deficits equaling 2.9 percent of the economy within four years.
Polling data suggest Americans are increasingly worried about mounting deficits and debt.
An AP-GfK poll last month gave Obama relatively poor grades on the deficit, with just 49 percent of respondents approving of the president's handling of the issue and 41 percent disapproving. By contrast, Obama's overall approval rating was 64 percent, with just 30 percent disapproving.
"Even using their February economic assumptions - which now appear to be out of date and overly optimistic - the administration never puts us on a stable path," said Marc Goldwein of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a bipartisan group that advocates budget discipline. "The president ... understands the critical importance of fiscal discipline. Now we need to see some action."
For the most part, Obama's updated budget tracks the 134-page outline he submitted to lawmakers in February. His budget remains a bold but contentious document that proposes higher taxes for the wealthy, a hotly contested effort to combat global warming and the first steps toward guaranteed health care for all.
Meanwhile, the congressional budget plan approved last month would not extend Obama's signature $400 tax credit for most workers - $800 for couples - after it expires at the end of next year.
Obama's "cap-and-trade" proposal to curb heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions is also reeling from opposition from Democrats from coal-producing regions and states with concentrations of heavy industry. Under cap-and-trade, the government would auction permits to emit heat-trapping gases, with the costs being passed on to consumers via higher gasoline and electric bills.
Also new in Obama's budget details are several tax "loophole" closures and increased IRS tax compliance efforts to raise $58 billion over the next decade to help finance his health care measure. The money would make up for revenue losses stemming from lower-than-hoped estimates for his proposal to limit wealthier people's ability to maximize their itemized deductions.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090512/D984FCB80.html

Baxter pharmaceutical sent weaponized live H5N1 avian flu virus to eighteen countries
WHAT TO EXPECT, MEANDERING SPECULATIONS
by Alan Stang May 1, 2009 NewsWithViews.com
For years, I have been speculating about the weapon the conspiracy for world government would use to precipitate the panic that would cause America to demand its own enslavement. When the conspiracy launched the present financial debacle, I thought the question had been answered. As obvious as it was, it had never occurred to me that the conspiracy would choose two such weapons to work in tandem.
But maybe it has. Will they finally succeed in launching the deadly pandemic that has fizzled in several attempts? A pandemic offers many unique elements. When you drop bombs on people, they know they are being attacked. Also, bombs don’t kill everyone. But when you launch a weaponized pandemic, people don’t know that for sure. Sickness happens – even pandemics happen – without criminal encouragement. The Black Death happened by itself. And a pandemic involves everyone.
Imagine people broke and homeless now facing a deadly disease. It is now possible that the Communists who control the Executive Branch may be deliberately trying to provoke a massive, popular reaction they can use to justify martial law and the concentration camps that would be part of it. In this case, they would call it “quarantine,” and uninfected Americans, worried about their children, would applaud when the government puts the sick on the bus.
The program would include vaccinations, which would include the usual poisons. Remember that the 1976 version of the swine flu vaccination killed more people than the disease itself. Recently, the Baxter pharmaceutical company “accidentally” sent weaponized deadly, live H5N1 avian flu virus to eighteen countries, an “accident” that is impossible and was discovered only by a genuine accident. Had it been injected into humans in all those countries, there would have been an instant pandemic for sure. Czech newspapers were talking conspiracy. Now comes word that Baxter will make the vaccine to fight the Mexican flu. What? Yes.
Health Ranger Mike Adams speculates that “for this to have been a natural combination of viral fragments, it means an infected bird from North America would have had to infect pigs in Europe, then be re-infected by those same pigs with an unlikely cross-species mutation that allowed the bird to carry it again, then that bird would have had to fly to Asia and infect pigs there, and those Asian pigs then mutated the virus once again (while preserving the European swine and bird flu elements) to become human transmittable, and then a human would have had to catch that virus from the Asian pigs –in Mexico! – and spread it to others.” Again, this is just one of many possible speculations.
Meanwhile, we have an affirmative action pretend “President” who almost blatantly hates the system he governs. Has there ever been such a critter in world history? Even psychotic exterminators like Stalin, Castro, Hitler and Mao professed to love the countries they governed. But Mr. Big Ears delights in telling dictators who want to destroy us how criminal we are.
The Declaration of Independence is the nation’s birth certificate. It can never be revoked. It says that whenever a government becomes oppressive, “destructive” of the people’s rights, they have the right to “alter or abolish it.” President Tom Jefferson says that every generation the tree of liberty must be altered with the “blood of patriots and tyrants.” Why would there be blood? Because governments don’t want to be abolished. They worship the power and lust for more.
Most of the time, the only way to abolish them is by force. That is why there would be blood. The Declaration says we have that right. President Tom encourages us to use it. Obviously he is talking about usurpation so total that the government is no longer the one the Founding Fathers left us but a totalitarian perversion. In such a case, he says, it is not only the people’s right to throw off such government; it is their duty.
We are very close to that situation now. Is that why people have bought every last round of ammunition in the country and then some? If Americans do as the President suggests, there would be blood, much blood, and death. Are they mentally prepared for that? Are they close to the intolerable desperation in which they have nothing to lose?
Whom would they be shooting at? In the excitement of getting it, I wonder how many people now laden down with ammo have thought about all this. Would they have the heart for it? So far, I have seen no discussion of these historic questions. No one is happier than I am that our people are so heavily armed. Have they taken time to think about the answers?
My hope and my belief are that, after years of exposés about the conspiracy for world government, enough Americans now understand the conspiracy is trying to provoke them to go military – wants them to rebel – providing the government the excuse to suppress them. My prayer is that such a horror never happens.
But we do have the Declaration and we do have authorization, even encouragement, from the President; we do know that political liberty and freedom of speech are being squelched and that we are moving into full blown totalitarian socialist dictatorship. Permanent cancellation of elections would not necessarily be a clue. Stalin had elections. They allow the people to vent. He was always “elected.”
Listening and reading about what could happen, I see a picture emerge. By the way, remember that I do not propose anything. I merely convey what I hear. In fact, I fervently hope none of this comes to pass. I am talking about the people DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, the Arizona bull dyke, is afraid of; the veterans she fears could become terrorists and who know how to do things. I am listening to them.
Of course the real terrorists are the communazis who run our government and who already lay a heavy hand on the people’s necks. Remember that Lenin created modern terrorism: “Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be thousands. . . .” Felix Dzerzhinsky, his secret police chief, said: “We stand for organized terror. . . .” Terror to Lenin did not mean people rising up against the government. It meant government terrorizing people.
I believe there will be a series of incidents. The psychological pressure cooker artificially created on both sides is already too great to contain. As the Seventh Avenue girdle manufacturer once put it, “Something’s got to give.” The danger is that these isolated incidents could get out of control.
Happily, I do not believe that danger is great. Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee should be forgiven for not recognizing soon enough that they faced satanic Communist monsters. Had they known in time, Jackson could perhaps have followed the fleeing Yankees all the way in to Washington after first Manassas, arrested our first Communist President and restored the Union. Lee said after Appomattox that had he known what he confronted soon enough, he would have fought to the last man.
But by now, after more than a century of Communism, after decades of alarms by a small band of tireless watchmen on the walls, I believe this generation of patriots is too knowledgeable to commit suicide by confronting a U.S. military liberated from the restraints of posse comitatus and persuaded by Napolitano that the patriots are “terrorists.” In lieu of such suicide, alternate scenarios are emerging.
One of the strangest posits a scenario in which the administration now is openly Nazi, denying the fundamental rights the Constitution guarantees. Elections are Stalinist charades. Police state controls make rebellion impossible. The judicious period of sober observation President Tom says must pass before a decision is made to “alter or abolish” a government has long since expired.
Suddenly, according to this scenario, the perpetrators begin to disappear. One by one by one, they vanish. There would be no shooting, no violence. One day they would be there, whistling while they work, reveling in confiscation of the people’s wealth, in loading people onto trucks, etc.; the next day they would not.
Of course, the men I hear talking do not mean people like affirmative action pretend “President” Mr. Big Ears. All Americans are united in the fervent hope that the Secret Service will keep him safe; the Obamatrons because they are morons who believe he is the One, the patriots because they want to see him humiliated and imprisoned for his crimes.
The same thing would apply to people like enemy alien chief-of-staff Rahm Emanuel, “the hemorrhoid.” Patriots want him safe for the same reason and he is no doubt too hard to reach, anyway. So, no, the scuttlebutt is not about Rahm. It is about the good folks who must leave the protected federal enclave to implement federal policy, not the police but, rather, the low- to mid-level people who do the confiscating, the speechmaking, the inspecting, the intimidating, etc.
Certainly one thing that inspires uncontrollable fear is uncertainty. Why did So-and-So at the next desk or in the next office disappear? People disappear for many reasons every day. Most of them have not been kidnapped. Maybe they were just fed up. Maybe they took the money and are sitting on a beach in Cancun, soaking up the flu. Maybe next week they will show up. In this case, there are no demands. There is no ransom. There are no anguished telephone calls. There is nothing for Jack Bauer and his loyal band of techies to investigate.
However true that is, the scenario says mere not knowing would inspire panic. So-and-So left his office and never came back. Is he in the Twilight Zone? What would happen were I to go up into the hills to inspect? The famous quote from Alexander Solzhenitsyn would not apply. There would be no bloody corpses, no heads beaten in beneath the stairs. It would be something even more terrifying, more eerie: nothing. It could disrupt the smooth functioning of government, but there would be nothing for the government to attack.
Of course, all of this is mere chatter, just one of the crazy ideas floating in the ether, blowin’ in the wind. Let us devoutly hope it turns out to be nothing.
http://frc4u.org/phpbb/index.php?topic=1290.0;topicseen