Saturday, December 20, 2008
Eeyore's News and View
Tolerating Spiders, Using Your Credit Cards, and Other Depression Survival Tactics
by Karen De Coster
Save a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.comSave a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.com Email a link to this articleEmail a link to this article Printer-friendly version of this articlePrinter-friendly version of this article View a list of the most popular articles on our siteView a list of the most popular articles on our site
I loathe spiders. My Dad always used to joke that I reacted as if they were man-eating creatures the size of tall buildings, as seen in the B movies. As a kid, I trounced through the woods at night, remarkably unaware of webs caressing my face and giant, hairy things clinging to my clothes. As an adult, they became my worst nightmare. I don’t know why – it just happened that way.
Living near a big lake, my house can be a refuge for crawling things that are out to get me. I am awful when it comes to killing spiders in the house. I have broken or bent more blinds than I can remember because of all the times that I used a hiking boot to kill off a tiny green spider. Accordingly, I have been using a pest control service to spray my house exterior, garage, and porch areas for spider control. This has always helped to control those nasty devils, especially during the warm months.
This year, however, with a depression looming, the spider control service came under my budget-cutting axe and got chopped. So it was the spiders versus me, alone and unarmed. I bought the most effective pest control sprays I could find and began to spray my own house, interior and exterior. I’ve had to do battle with a few killer tarantulas the size of a basketball, but thus far it’s been a success. I have even relaxed around spiders and don’t fear killing them. I don’t like it, but I no longer stare them down for twenty minutes planning my exact point of attack. When I finally set aside the hiking boot for a (very large) wad of paper towel, I knew I had successfully conquered my fear.
The point is that doing my own pest control – something that is most difficult for me to do – has saved me a chunk of dollars annually. We are living in unprecedented times, and as a result, each of us needs to examine our lifestyle, budget, savings and investment plans, and needs vs. wants. The times ahead will demand a level of fiscal restraint that my generation has never before had to endure. I have spent a lot of time in the last two years counseling friends and family about cutting their budgets, eliminating the wants they can do without, and generally, helping them to clean the financial house. Accordingly, I have put together a short list of items to consider for conserving financial resources and keeping yourself prepared in case of a job loss, wage or hours cut, and other events within the depression economy that can negatively affect your personal or financial status. One thing I will not do is provide silly, impractical ideas such as turning down your thermostat (mine is comfortably on 74; I will not shiver and wear triple layers in my own home), cutting back on quality food items that are essential for good health, or riding your bike to work. Instead, I have provided some basic, libertarian-influenced ideas to think about in order to prepare for the tough times ahead.
Credit, Credit, Credit
Your credit score is more important than ever in these unstable times. Let’s look at some things you can do to help preserve or boost your credit condition.
First off, don’t jump to conclusions and think you have to shed your credit cards. Credit cards can be a real asset if you know how to use them. Banks favor people who use credit lines responsibly and pay debt down timely. Before the have-pulse-will-loan credit bubble was born, young people – with no credit history – used to have a hard time accessing credit. If underwriting standards go back to where they should be (and used to be), this will be the case once again. Don’t close down credit cards you have had for a long time, especially if you have generous lines of credit on them. Unused credit lines impart to your creditors a message of control and dependability. Keep longer-term cards with larger credit lines and dump the cards with the "starter" credit lines. Credit cards with puny credit lines – $1,000 or 2,000 – aren’t very favorable toward your credit score. Also, since banks frown on debtors who carry a balance of more than 35% of their total line of credit, a $400 charge on a card with a $1,000 balance can ding your credit score. If you do keep balances on your card(s), keep more cards with lower balances as opposed to dumping it all on one or two cards and blowing over that 35% figure. If you do have a credit card with debt that is over 35% of the credit line, call the bank and ask for an appropriate credit line increase that will drop your balance below that point.
Also, banks are starting to reassess their risks, and hence their exposure to consumer credit. If customers are not using their cards, many banks are closing out their accounts without them requesting any such action. I have heard from many acquaintances and readers who report that this has happened to them. The loss of an unused credit line may ding your credit report. Use your cards that you want to keep. Charge bigger ticket items and pay the bill in full when it comes due. That keeps your account active. Or even pay an occasional interest bill for one month to keep the bank happy. Paying customers will be retained by the banks. It is worth an occasional, small interest charge to keep open a credit line that 1) benefits your credit score, and 2) you can use in a worst-case scenario (just ask someone who has been fired/laid-off without warning).
Or better yet, game your credit cards. J.H. Huebert wrote an article on this recently – I enthusiastically support his position. Use your Discover – if you have one – for cash back on gas and auto expenses. As you roll up your points you can turn the points into cash to pay off the balance. Use ‘cash back’ and ‘airline miles’ cards – this is smart money management. You can borrow money in the short term for no charge, pay off your balance upon receiving the bill, and earn free money. A secondary benefit of this type of credit use is that it will be beneficial for your credit score.
Cars!
Avoid buying a new car unless you absolutely have the cash flow to absorb the payment. The credit bubble put people into the bad habit of perpetually buying or leasing a car and making endless payments. The credit bubble warped peoples’ time preferences and their perceptions of their own financial condition. Decisions to finance items – especially cars – were based on "Can I make that payment with my current situation remaining the same?" The fact that people were living paycheck-to-paycheck in order to make their payments on debt didn’t seem to matter. As long as they could make the payment from current available cash, the purchase was deemed practical.
If your budget can accommodate it, however, this is a great time to be buying a car. Rebates are bountiful and interest rates are zilch for people with a solid credit history. Otherwise, remember Gary North-a-nomics and think used car (See Part I and Part II see below). Pay cash for a well-used car in great shape with higher miles at a good price. As an adherent of Gary North’s used car credo, I drove the same truck for 250k miles and 14.5 years. I’d still have it except the engine bearings were wearing down, and plus, the 11 miles per gallon at $4.40/gallon was a bit much. I looked at replacing the engine, but the truck was also going to need $2,000–3,000 of bodywork to stave off the rust that was starting to appear. So I bought a 2003 vehicle with 70k miles in mint shape. I immediately put some Pirelli tires on it. The interior looks entirely unused, still, even with 115k miles.
If you are stuck with a new car with a hefty payment (thereby crimping your cash flow), get rid of it. Instead, pay cash for a used car or put a sizeable down payment on a used car that you can pay off in a year or two. Take care of your car. Do all maintenance and fix things when they break. Little things matter, like maintaining your fluids and keeping the interior clean. Spend the money to keep it sharp. You don’t need the over-priced meal at P.F. Chang, but you do need your car.
Eating Out
Consider this a worst offense for many of us. Stop eating out so often, and for goodness sakes, do some grocery shopping and put the brakes on the carry-out orders. The biggest culprit is eating lunch out because you are too lazy to pack food each day to take to work. Eliminate most lunches out and save yourself a ton – those lunches are a waste of resources. Dinners out are enjoyable because you share that with good friends, family, and lovers, but cut back on that habit and keep it to a minimum. Nowadays, restaurants are going coupon crazy because they are trying to draw you in as a customer and stay afloat in hard times. When you do go out to eat, be flexible as to restaurant choice and use the coupons. I now get coupons in the mail from some of the nicest places in town, and this is something these restaurants have not done in the past.
One obvious occurrence of the boom has been the development of the seemingly trendy, high-priced restaurant. Mom-and-Pop, family-style restaurants, though reasonably priced, became bland and boring while overpriced and mediocre bistros, steakhouses, and entertainment-theme restaurants flourished. People who couldn’t afford the pricey family outings did so anyways, eating beyond their means thanks to an excess of Mastercard moments. These places are losing their attractiveness as the banks reel in credit lines and people return to a more cash-based existence. Those restaurants that offer something truly unique – healthy, organic, vegetarian, genuine upscale, or just great service/food – will survive and figure out a way to retain customers and make a profit in a downturn. Look for deals from the survivors – they will be there. But never, ever put a meal on a credit card – unless the card is used for budget, business, or convenience purposes and will be paid in full when due.
Coffee, Caffeine, Starbucks
This is a tough one for me because I don’t like to diss Starbucks. Two years ago, I waited for Starbucks to mark down its Barista expresso machines to half-price, which I knew was always the case each year right before Christmas. Now I buy fresh beans and grind them myself and I make my own lattes most of the time. That means I have to get up five minutes earlier, or be to work five minutes later than usual. No big deal. The cost of each cup of latte, with sugar-free syrup and whip cream, does not exceed fifty cents. The same latte at Starbucks costs $4. Starbucks should be an occasional treat for most of us. On a consistent basis, it is a huge waste of your money. Unless you are upper-middle class or above, you cannot afford the Starbucks lifestyle. Think about buying your own machine – you typically have to spend $200 or more to get a good one that will work dependably and last, but it will pay off in the long term.
Coupons
A co-worker recently said to me: "I don’t have time for cutting and using coupons." I’ve never heard such bloody nonsense. Neither do I "have the time," but I do use them and always have. I use coupons for my dry cleaning, airport parking, oil changes, car washes, pet services, manicures/pedicures, and all of my favorite retail stores, including Bath & Body Works, New York & Company, and Borders. Sign up for emails from your favorite retailers to help make coupon collecting painless. However, don’t use the excuse of coupons to buy something that you probably shouldn’t be buying.
Food
I may go to three grocery/food stores in one evening in order to take advantage of sales, double coupons, buy-one-get-one-free sales, freshness/quality options, etc. I rarely pay the regular price for anything, except for differentiated food items or items that don’t often go on sale.
Learn to substitute for foods when the prices are up. For instance, produce prices can be erratic. If vine-ripened tomatoes go from $1.29/lb to 2.99, don’t buy them. Don’t buy blueberries, strawberries, iceberg lettuce, seedless cucumbers, green onions, or other items when they are double the typical price. You have to be willing to change your habits in order to adjust to price changes. If you are a creature of habit, set in your never-changing ways, learn to get out of that rut, and quick. Learn to change. Buy frozen foods, canned goods, and paper products in large lots when they are on sale. I have a basement fruit cellar – the size of a small bathroom – for storage of food and essentials.
Too Many Sales
Don’t use the excuse of a clearance or sale to buy something that you probably shouldn’t be buying. Don’t cripple yourself financially with discount addiction. Don’t use clearances and sales and bargains and Black Fridays as an excuse to overspend or rack up debt. The same goes for Wal-Mart, Costco, or the other discount stores. Buying too much crap on sale at Wal-Mart is no more honorable than buying too much crap from Best Buy or Ann Taylor.
Home Security
Security in your home becomes more necessary when economic times are harsh and the riffraff become more daring. Crime is already up in many areas, especially home burglaries and invasions. Here’s where money spent can make you more Depression-proof. A home defense shotgun is a good start, followed by a pistol and a concealed weapons permit. Don’t just buy guns to stuff them in a drawer until the moment comes – learn how to use them and master them. If necessary, go to your local range or gun shop and pay about $70–100/hour (or thereabouts) to spend a few hours with a professional who will show you how to use and master your guns for personal protection purposes. Also, learn the basics of home protection such as picking a "safe room" and keeping an extra cell phone and a high-intensity, tactical flashlight in the room. I hang out on Internet gun boards occasionally in order to get some valuable tips along these lines. I also recommend Boston’s Gun Bible for everyone.
Since the one thing you want to ultimately do is keep the intruder from entering your home, there are steps you can take to deter an unfavorable situation. A security system – from a major company such as ATD or Protection One – costs about $300–$400 to install and about $40 per month for monitoring services. The signs will deter all but the professional criminals. The neighborhood undesirables who are looking to kick in a door or break a window so they can walk away with your DVD player, jewelry, or other items with street value will go somewhere else where the pickings are easier. You can also install driveway and/or landscape lighting to keep your property well lit at all times. I stuck those new, environmental bulbs in my front and side exterior house lamps, and I leave them on all the time. They last a long time. This electricity cost is not where you’ll want to save. My additional electric cost, in addition to occasional bulb replacement, is very minimal. A motion detector light (or two) on the house, when it is set correctly, is an excellent deterrent. Lowlifes scrounging for goods to turn into cash for their next bottle of liquor, Whopper, or drug purchase don’t want to deal with layers of impediments to their plan of action. Spend some money to make your house a difficult option for them.
Mall Wandering
For most people this is too great a temptation to survive. When people wander malls with no purpose, they tend to buy things they don’t need, and yes, things they don’t even want a week or a month later. Mall wandering has become a great American pastime because the credit bubble enabled people to buy what they didn’t need without justifying the expense that is to be spread out over years, with interest. I see whole families wandering the mall together. It’s become the way to fight boredom. People who are bored should stay home and be bored away from the temptation of buying stuff.
Get Rid of Your Land Phone
Ditch it if you can do it safely. Most people, including the kids, have cell phones, so why the landline? Even the cheapest calling plan is still too much to pay. The worst part of having a landline is the government taxes that are attached to the bill. Push aside your many excuses and determine if you really need one or if it’s just a crutch you lean on because you dislike change. Family plans for cell phones are so cheap now that it rarely makes sense to have a land phone anymore.
Wine
Sorry, there’s too much to say that this one gets its own article in my upcoming "Wines for the Depression," coming soon on LewRockwell.com.
The House
This is essential. Take care of your house. Don’t let things crumble and become withered. Avoid outlandish expenses that became a ritual during the McMansion mania of the credit bubble. As far as your maintenance equipment, it is time to stop thinking everything is disposable. Snowblowers, lawnmowers, edgers, leafblowers, etc. – they all can be maintained.
Many people who over-indulged during the boom are now selling off their assets in order to stay afloat. Look for used appliances, furniture, and lawn & garden equipment on Craigslist and elsewhere. There are a lot of good bargains out there right now, and if you have cash you can take advantage of them.
Fitness/Health
Take care of your fitness needs. Don’t eliminate your gym/sports/fitness expenses if you use them. Now is the time to be healthy and fit, and to stay that way. On that note, if you are overweight and you need to spend money (Weight Watchers, health clinic, gym/personal trainer, special foods or supplements, etc.) to bring that under control, do it. Cut the budget elsewhere, but don’t give up your health.
Miscellaneous
I have a few personal spending traps – iTunes, books, and useful electronic gadgets like computers, iPods, satellite radio, and BlackBerry. Not bad, because it could be worse, like using my house as an ATM, being addicted to new cars, or even pricey clothes, shoes, and jewelry – none of which describes me. I have also cut back on a favorite purchase of mine: magazines. I stopped buying them altogether. Determine where your spending waste is and try to cut back on that stuff where and when it makes sense. For instance, I know I need to replace a computer or BlackBerry every now and then, but I don’t need magazines and I have not found it necessary to toss my old-but-working Toshiba television in favor of a trendier $1,200 plasma TV.
Surviving a Depression is going to demand financial strength which is acquired via fiscal restraint. Even people who have exercised restraint and have not taken part in the debt-for-stuff orgy need to re-assess their financial condition and determine what moves they need to make to ride out the tough times ahead. Some items we deem essential, and others we just like to have. It is up to each individual to determine his or her highest-priority needs and most useful wants, and strike a sensible balance between them.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/decoster/decoster139.html
Used Cars
by Gary North
Save a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.comSave a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.com Email a link to this articleEmail a link to this article Printer-friendly version of this articlePrinter-friendly version of this article View a list of the most popular articles on our siteView a list of the most popular articles on our site
It's that time of the year again. It's new car season. You are going to be pressured to part with a lot of money. You may be tempted to do this by the siren call of the new car ads. I write this report as a way to help you get through this month of temptation with your finances still intact.
I write this report as a man who had two cars die on him last month, who then bought a "new" used car, and whose son is driving another of his cars that is sounding like it, too, is becoming terminal. I presently drive a car that is in such a state of decrepitude that my wife has said she will no longer ride in it – an extreme view, in my opinion. I have another car in the repair shop today. But there is a real possibility that this car can be resurrected for another two years for under $500, and I can then turn over my car to my son. I'll sell the terminal one for $1,000.
At present, my newest vehicle is the recently purchased one. It's a 1994. The dead ones were a 1991 and a 1981. The one in the shop is a 1991. My car is a 1987. The one my son drives is a 1984.
My entire inventory of used cars at the beginning of last month was probably worth about $11,000. I do not tie up a lot of my wealth in cars. And, most of the time, most of them are running. They get me from here to there and back.
My wife did use our AAA card a lot last month. Statistics ganged up on me. That can happen once every decade if the inventory value of your fleet of cars isn't worth the price of a new Toyota Corolla.
I bought a new car once, in 1972. It was a Corolla. It was a lemon. The engine blew up three times in the first two years. Finally, a local dealer was authorized by Toyota to rebuild the engine at company expense because the engine for that model had been poorly designed. I kept the car for another 14 years. I drove it from 1972 to 1988.
I recall one day when I parked the car at church. My assistant was in the parking area. He was standing with another man – younger, always in debt, and who lusted after hot new sports cars. My associate pointed to my then decade-old Toyota, and said to him, "Maybe someday you'll be rich enough to afford a car like this." Exactly!
THE FREE MARKET IN ACTION
Over the next four weeks, the American public will be subjected to a concentrated advertising barrage that takes place every September. After Labor Day, the industry's new cars are rolled out on the nation's TV screens.
The annual month-long mass redistribution of wealth will now begin. Keynesian economists regard this as America's month of months. The auto industry constitutes something in the range of 5% of the U.S. economy. What happens in September to the auto industry points to the entire economy's performance for the next twelve months. What consumers are willing to spend on new cars is indicative of what they will spend on everything else.
Unlike Christmas, the other great indicator of consumer sentiment, the auto market has a used goods sector. What used car buyers are willing to spend influences the trade-in value of the new car buyers' existing inventory of used cars. This, in turn, influences the trade-in price offered by car dealers to new car buyers.
There is no more comprehensive, interconnected, top-to-bottom income distribution market than the American auto market. It is the consummate example of free market voluntarism in action.
I regard the system of car sales as the free market at its best, despite the fact that it is regarded by critics as the free market at its worst. When the Democrats wanted to torpedo Richard Nixon's candidacy for President in 1960, they put up a cheap, mass-produced drawing of him, with this phrase: "Would you buy a used car from this man?" Because of the closeness of that election, that poster probably cost him the Presidency. The suggestion was that Nixon was more crooked than a used car dealer. As it turned out three elections later, he was.
Used car salesmen have bad reputations. Used home salesmen do not. Why the difference? It is probably because of the different levels of pricing ignorance in the two markets. There are lemon houses, just as there are lemon cars. But, because of the size of the loans made to buyers to buy homes, there is more money charged to the buyer by the lending agencies and other support agencies to increase their amount of information regarding the value of the loan's underlying asset. The lender wants to reduce the risk of default by the buyer. He adopts various techniques to reduce his risk, and these techniques reduce the buyers' zones of ignorance. Buyers are willing to pay for these third-party services because of the unit price per house. The buyer is more concerned about the possibility of winding up with a lemon house than a lemon car.
There is another factor: gender. Men buy cars. Women buy houses. Husbands may veto a house purchase due to its price, but they don't make the decision about what to buy. Wives do. So, women are more heavily involved in the purchase of homes than they are in the purchase of cars. Also, female salespeople listen far more closely to what female buyers say they want to buy than male salesmen do. "Men don't listen to what women say," women complain. This is why there are so many female realtors. They do listen to what women say. They can actually understand what women mean, despite what women actually say.
There are almost no car saleswomen. They don't have the stomach for it. Macho sales techniques have more to do with the sales of cars than with the sales of homes. Car sales are determined more by specialized sales pressures from salesmen than by the buyers' decisions. This is true in home sales, too, but not to the same degree. Wives spend more time in houses as consumers or trying to keep them running than husbands spend in cars as consumers or trying to keep them running. Buyers of houses have more knowledge about houses than buyers of cars have about cars. Sellers of cars therefore have an advantage over buyers of cars.
Fortunately, the World Wide Web is beginning to offset the sellers' advantages.
CAVEAT EMPTOR
In Tyler, Texas, there used to be the most accurately named used car dealership in American history: Caveat Emptor Motors. "Let the buyer beware." It was a clever name, but the company went out of business. I guess the buyers bewore too much.
Because the zone of ignorance is larger regarding used cars than new cars, there is more room for skilled negotiating and deception by sellers. A buyer can find out on the Web what a car dealer paid for a new car. He cannot find out what the dealer paid for a used car.
The ignorance factor is why there is such a fast rate of depreciation for a new car. A new car that is running well is unlikely to be sold. When a very new car is sold, the prospective buyer thinks, "What's wrong with this car?" He doesn't think, "What's wrong with the seller's situation?" To make the sale, the seller has to offer a believable reason. The usual reason is this: "I have an emergency." But this reason produces lower offers. Buyers seek to take advantage of the seller's lack of liquidity and lack of time. So, prices of recently purchased new cars fall like a stone. Drive a new car off the lot, and you have just lost at least 10% of the sales price, and maybe 15%.
For new car buyers, the re-sale value of the car is less than the money they owe on the car. This remains true for at least three years. Only after year three does the rate of depreciation slow enough to allow the borrower to catch up with the re-sale value of his car. But then, in year four, he buys another new car. He never really gets ahead. This is why I will not buy a new car.
I won't borrow money to buy a car. I don't borrow money to pay for any depreciating asset. So, I limit myself to used cars, and normally used cars that are at least five years old.
Last month, I bought a 1994 Lincoln Continental for $3,500. It runs almost flawlessly. It has only one defect. The oil pressure gauge is hooked up to an electronic gong, and the thing beeps for no reason from time to time. The driver has to whack the dashboard to get it to quit. I am hoping there is a wire that some mechanic can cut to stop this. But it's a small price to pay in annoyance for an otherwise smooth-running car. My wife plans to drive it for at least six or seven years. At the end of that time, it will probably still be worth $1,000.
I do have to take each of my cars to the repair shop twice a year or maybe more. So what? If I spend (say) $200 per visit, that's way less money spent in that month than most people pay to their lender every month to drive a new car. I could spend $200 every month per car in repairs, and I would still be ahead of a new car buyer, except for my lost time. I own several used cars, so I have always one in reserve. If one car is in the shop for a few days, it's no problem.
I don't have to pay extra money in auto insurance to cover the repair cost of a new car. It doesn't pay to buy collision damage insurance for a car worth less than $5,000, which mine are worth. That's more in insurance savings per car per year than I normally spend per car in normal repairs.
One of the dead cars died on my wife on the way back from a trip to Nashville, a drive of about 450 miles each way. She had just visited my daughter. So, we sat down and figured a better way. We should have done this earlier. We can rent a mini-van for a week for about $375. If we shop around, we might get it for $350. If she visits twice a year, that's no more than $750. What would the depreciation and insurance be for a comparable used mini-van that is two years old? It would cost $16,000 to buy it – probably from Enterprise Car Rental. It would then depreciate by at least $2,000 a year. It would cost money to insure it, and I would probably buy collision damage coverage. On the road, if a rental car breaks down, you get a replacement car that day and an apology. If your 2-year-old $16,000 car breaks down, you are stuck in a distant city with a mess to sort out. You may face a repairman like the one in that TV ad ten years ago. "How much will it cost to repair my car?" Answer: "How much do you have?"
How many long driving trips do you take each year? Most people take no more than two or three. So, rent a car for long trips. It's cheaper than buying a new one that you would trust on the road. Buy older cars that don't depreciate fast. Use them around town.
REDUCING YOUR IGNORANCE, CHEAPLY
The reason why used cars sell for so much less than new cars is buyer's risk. The buyer is taking a greater risk when buying a used car than a new car. Also, the seller is in a weaker bargaining position than a new car dealer. He is not a skilled salesman. If you can reduce your risk by obtaining better information on the make and model of the car, and if you are in a position to walk away from a deal, you will save a lot of money when buying a used car from a private party. There are two wonderful free Web sites, Kelley Blue Book and Edmunds. You can look up any brand of car, any model, any year. Kelley has a great feature: the used car price from a dealer (retail), and the price from a private party. Here is where you regain your advantage as a buyer. You can find out what is a reasonable price for any make, year, or model, in one of five levels of condition. You can even put in the mileage. Kelley lets you identify your zip code. You will find out what prices in your region are.
Nobody likes to pay for car repairs. You can consult Consumer Reports to find the reliability factor for most cars. It's in the book that they put out annually. Your local library has it. Or you can subscribe for $3.95 for one month to the on-line version of Consumer Reports. Cancel after one month if you like.
CR also runs a "Used cars to avoid" list. That one, you must consult. Another list: "Used cars: best and worst." Read it.
Subscribers can search for any make or model and find out its reliability history and used car price range. The Toyota Camry is always at the top of the list. Most of the top-rated cars are Japanese.
Note for economy car buyers: A Chevrolet Prizm is identical to a Toyota Corolla, but it usually costs less to buy used. Most people don't know they are the same car, produced in the same Fremont, California factory.
Another way to reduce the likelihood of buying a lemon is to buy a particular brand of used car only at a car lot where that brand is sold new. If you want to buy a used Chrysler, buy it at a Chrysler dealership. The used car on the lot was a trade-in from someone who presumably bought a new Chrysler. He was satisfied with the older car, so he bought the same brand. He was reeled in by the ads for the new model. Too bad for him. Good for you.
Buy a FAX-based report on any car that you really are ready to buy. The service is called CARFAX. CARFAX's report will reveal if the car was ever involved in an accident. If the car was ever in an accident, don't buy it for anything but a super-low price. As a run-around-town car, it may be OK, but only at a very good price.
GETTING THE BEST DEAL FROM A DEALERSHIP
I suggest that you go to this Web site: http://www.carbuyingtips.com/used.htm
The article is long, detailed, and really hard-nosed. If you will do what it says, no used car salesman will have an advantage over you. The author of the report has certain rules, such as these:
1. Have a mechanic put the car up on a lift for inspection. Check for accident damage.
2. Run a vehicle history report (CARFAX).
3. Never sign an "sold as is" paper at a used car dealership.
4. If you need financing, have it lined up before you go to a used car dealership.
I would add these rules:
1. Don't buy the car without going home, running a CARFAX check, and thinking carefully about buying.
2. Be sure you have a top price in mind that is lower than the dealer's asking price.
3. When you return to negotiate, have in your possession a filled-in check for your top price, including tax & license. When you sit down with the salesman, hand him the check. He can take it or leave it. Don't ever negotiate with a pro. Put the burden to decide on him. A signed check does this. Because nobody buys cars without debt, your check in his hand will unnerve him. This is good.
4. If he doesn't accept it, come back when he isn't there, go to another salesman, look at the same car, and go back to his office. Write out a new check right in front of him, with the same top price. He may take it.
Shop during daylight hours. You can more easily see any defects in the car's exterior.
Shop in the morning. Negotiate the first round before noon. Then come back in the afternoon, if you like. Deal with the same salesman.
If the morning's salesman doesn't capitulate, come back in the evening and try to find another salesman, preferably young. Make a beeline for the youngest guy on the floor. Don't let an old, experienced salesman intercept you. Spot the young guy before you walk into the showroom.
Don't tell him that you made an offer earlier. Have him walk around with you. Then, lo and behold, you just happen to find the car you'd like to buy. Go back to his office. Write the check in front of him. Don't use the original check. He may catch on that you have been there before.
There is another strategy to get down the price. It's a good one when you have a particular car in mind. Don't come back to buy it for 30 days. Any used car that is on a lot for more than 30 days is a loser for the dealer. He ought to sell it. The salesman has an incentive to sell it.
There is an ultimate fall-back strategy for any negotiation, once you have decided to buy any item. It is a good strategy when you really don't know what an item is worth in the open market. The better the salesman is as a negotiator, the better this strategy works for you. Rarely does anyone use it.
Tell the salesman that you have a top price in mind. You absolutely will not go higher. In fact, if you don't get this price, you will walk out of the dealership and go to another. You will not be back until the next time you buy a car – but not for this purchase. The salesman must believe you for my strategy to work. You must be willing to do what you say.
Tell the salesman to write down his absolutely lowest price on a piece of paper. You will write down your top price. You will then exchange the papers. If your top price is above his lowest price, you will split the difference: 50-50. For example, if your top price is $7,000, and his lowest price is $6,000, you will pay him $6,500.
Make sure that he knows that this price is for everything: taxes, license, whatever. The check will be exactly this: no add-ons.
If he accepts your challenge, do the exchange of papers. If his price is lower, split the difference, write the check, and hand it to him. A check in a used car salesman's hand is a powerful motivator. He can go back and talk to his manager, or whatever other ritual song and dance he wants to perform for you. But his manager will know that it's all or nothing. "Take this offer or lose any sale whatsoever."
Go shopping in the first week of the month. Then wait for a month to buy the vehicle you want. Have three or four in mind. Don't feel pressured to buy. There will be other cars. By the way, this is another reason to have a spare car in reserve: less pressure on you to buy when your main car dies, or you get tired of taking it to the shop.
A salesman has a monthly quota to meet. If he has met his quota by the end of the month, he is less pressured to deal. At the first of the month, he is under more pressure. Make your offer in the first week. But let the cars you're interested in sit there for a month.
Sell your existing car in the local newspaper. Don't try to trade it in to the dealer. If you do, it will confuse the issue, and a salesman makes more money when the issue is confused. Better yet: keep the car as a reserve car. This will reduce the future pressure for you to "buy now." You want the pressure on the seller to "sell now."
The more valuable your time, the less time you should invest in shopping for a used car. But take your teenage son or daughter along with you. Make it a teaching experience. If your children don't get into the habit of going into debt for cars, this will help them immensely in later years.
NEWSPAPER ADS
Go onto the Web and go to your local newspaper. It probably has classifieds listed on-line. Our local paper has an auto section on-line, divided into a van section, an SUV section, and a trucks section. Each is broken down by brand, then by price. It's easy to use.
Start looking. Call around. If your top goal is a low price, keep looking for two or three weeks. You're looking for an ad that keeps showing up in the classifieds. At some point, the seller may get discouraged.
Go see the car. Take a print-out from Kelley or Edmunds. Tell him that you won't pay more than this price. Tell him that your offer will stand for three days. Hand him the print-out. Put your first name and phone number on it. Then get in your car and drive away. If he calls, fine. If not, keep looking.
The ads in the weekly Thrifty Nickel-type newspapers are probably run by people with less money in reserve and more immediate pressure to sell than the person who runs an ad in the daily paper. Be ready to negotiate with these people.
One way to find out over the phone why the person is selling is to say, "That sounds like a really great car. Why would you want to sell it?" The person is more likely to tell you the truth if he thinks you are interested in his car, unless the truth is that it's a lemon. Most used cars aren't lemons, which is why their owners keep driving them. You want to discover his motivation for selling, so that you can make an offer he won't refuse. His motivation probably has more to do with alimony payments than auto repair expenses.
CONCLUSION
When a new car costs as much as a used house, buy the used house and rent it out. It will probably appreciate. The new car won't.
By buying used cars and avoiding debt, you will reduce your lifetime costs of transportation by a significant amount. If the barrier for you to avoid debt on a depreciating item is for you to buy only cheaper used cars, then buy cheaper used cars. Assume that you'll buy a lemon once in a while. I bought a 1994 Lincoln for $3,500. I can afford to buy a dozen of them that way, year by year, rather than a new Lincoln. They won't all be lemons. Also, there is no guarantee that a new Lincoln won't be a lemon.
Note: before you buy any used car, rent a copy of the 1980 comedy, "Used Cars." It is my favorite Kurt Russell movie. The segment on the interrupted Jimmy Carter TV speech on inflation is worth the $1 it will cost to rent the movie.
September 6, 2002
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north124.html
Used Cars: A Follow-Up
by Gary North
Save a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.comSave a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.com Email a link to this articleEmail a link to this article Printer-friendly version of this articlePrinter-friendly version of this article View a list of the most popular articles on our siteView a list of the most popular articles on our site
Last September, I wrote about how to buy a used car.
When you can save thousands of after-tax dollars, you should. I have a particular philosophy of local transportation that some readers may not share, but those who are doing their best to increase their net worth do share it.
LAST GASPS
On Sunday, as I drove to church, my 1990 Chrysler Town & Country minivan’s odometer rolled over 230,000 miles. I bought it for $8,000 when it had 120,000 miles on it. That was in 1996, I think. I had to make a few repairs, such as CV joints, but on the whole, I have limited repair costs to about $500 a year. Adding this money to the initial purchase price, we get about $11,000. A new Chrysler T&C minivan in 1996 was about $28,000, plus taxes – call it $30,000. Instead of shelling out that kind of money, I paid about $8,250 with taxes.
Not including insurance and gasoline, I have driven that car for about ten cents per mile. It got about 15 mpg, so with gasoline at $1.30 per gallon on average, my gasoline cost per mile was about nine cents. That adds up to under 20 cents per mile, total. For purposes of comparison, the IRS allows 36 cents per mile as a business deduction.
The car is finally reaching the limits of my patience. It handles OK, but the heater is bad, the air conditioner is gone, the lifters are noisy, and I don’t trust it for anything other than local diving. It’s great for hauling stuff around on the property, including my dogs. If it dies, so what? Still, I could probably get $1,200 for it by running an ad in the local newspaper. The fact is, almost any car that still runs is worth about $1,000. That’s the bottom end of your used car investment risk.
I like minivans. I can drive in them comfortably all day long. I can’t do that in a car with bucket seats. If I were in the market for a new minivan, I would buy a Toyota Siena. But I don’t buy new cars. The depreciation is too high.
A used Chrysler doesn’t command the higher price that a used Toyota or Honda minivan commands. Yet the quality is close enough for just driving around, which is all I am interested in paying for. So, I went shopping for a used Plymouth/Dodge/Chrysler minivan, which are essentially the same car, especially after years of normal wear and tear.
Our local newspaper has a nice feature on its free website. You can go to "classifieds," look under "transportation," click "vans & buses," and get a list of available vehicles, arranged alphabetically by make and by year: oldest first. This makes shopping incredibly easy.
I was looking specifically for a 1993. According to Consumer Reports, the 1989-92 Chrysler minivans had a major problem with transmissions. The 1994-97 minivans are listed under "Used cars to avoid." However, when I checked the specific ratings on the model, the page said the 1997 model was average.
I was after a bargain: low price, low risk. That narrowed it down: a 1993 minivan. I checked the paper. Sure enough, there was a 1993 model for $2,300. That price seemed reasonable to me. I went to see it. It was clean.
THE NEXT STEP
We have used a car repair company for several years. I got permission from car’s owner to take it to that company for an inspection. This is only reasonable. The owner agreed.
There is an old line: "Never ask a barber if you need a haircut." When you get a used car analysis from a repair shop, you are liable to get an inflated list of things that are wrong, several of them high-ticket items. Of course, if the company overdoes it, you may decide not to buy the car. It’s a trade-off.
The estimate came in at $1,340. That seemed high to me. I wanted a second opinion.
I called a local repair shop. It’s located closer to me in the low, low rent part of town. I listed the items I had been told needed to be repaired. They called back in an hour. Their price was $650 – under half.
That caught my attention. Maybe I was being misled by repair shop #1. I drove over to the second shop and had them check the car for the two most expensive suggested repairs, a total of $711. They checked them both. "No problem," was their answer.
That made my decision much easier: (1) buy the car; (2) from now on, always get a second opinion after the first opinion by the first repair shop.
Will I still go to the first repair shop? Only if I decide to have them inspect another used car. That costs $27. If they spot something wrong, I’ll verify this with the second shop, and then ask for a competing bid.
The point is, the free market provides lots of competition. When we are talking about hundreds of dollars, I’m willing to spend a couple of hours shopping. If I were Bill Gates, I’d hire someone to do this for me. Of course, if I were Bill Gates, I would not be shopping for a decade-old car.
IS THIS REALLY WORTH MY TIME?
On a pure cost-benefit analysis of the value of my time, probably not. My time should be spent writing. But we are creatures of our youth. I grew up middle class. For me to abandon that mindset at this late date would probably be close to impossible. In any case, the middle-class mindset is a good one. It is careful in budgeting money, though it trades off with budgeting time.
The middle-class buyer wants his cars and tools to work well, but he is willing to buy a car or a tool that doesn’t look new or impressive. In fact, he has a sense of victory when he locates a bargain.
That same attitude is beneficial in business, when a lack of a budget is almost a guarantee of overspending and future bankruptcy. The middle-class mindset is what we read about in The Millionaire Next Door and The Millionaire Mind.
The author tells the story of a very rich executive whose staff planned to buy him a new Cadillac as a present. They had all done very well with bonuses and what-not. (This was pre-Enron.) The man got word of it and told them not to do it. The plan’s organizer wanted to know why. After all, it was a free car. No, it wasn’t, the boss said. A man who drives that kind of car has to live in a neighborhood to go with it. Then his wife has to buy the furniture to go with the new home. The free car would cost him a fortune. (Mattel exploited this budgeting pressure with Barbie.)
A person who shops for bargains when he has the money to buy premium stuff is like a driver who signals that he’s going to turn even though he is driving down a deserted highway. Habits save us when we don’t have time to make careful decisions. When you have a good habit, it’s wise to honor it. It may be a life-or-death matter, and you want instincts to take over. It’s like checking a gun to make sure it’s not loaded if you haven’t had your eyes on it the entire time. I say this as a man whose great uncle was shot dead by an unloaded rifle. His son pulled the trigger.
THE DETROIT CAR SHOW
"Sunday Morning," my favorite TV show ("As Time Goes By" is second), did a segment on the Detroit auto show. The show featured lots of "muscle" cars – cars so low that a man my age could not get into it, and if he did, his wife would think he was nuts. (His first wife, anyway.)
There was a 1,000 horsepower, low-slung monster with 1,000 foot-pounds of torque. A Ferrari? No. A Porsche? No. A Cadillac. I have an award-winning ad campaign in mind: "This is not your great-grandfather’s Cadillac." I can see it now: some 70-year-old guy struggling just to get into the driver’s seat. He turns on the ignition. Vroom. He gets it onto the highway. Vroom, vroom. He floors it. He blacks out. This makes about as much sense as J. Howard Marshall marrying Anna Nicole Smith, with similar effects.
A non-muscle car was the $325,000 Rolls-Royce. It has a deep lengthwise hole in the door for storing an umbrella. This shows "attention to detail," the salesman told the interviewer. My wife pays even more attention to detail. "You have to open the door to access the umbrella, and if the wind is blowing at you, the rain will get on you while you’re trying to get it out of the slot and then open it." If it’s on the floor in the back or tucked behind a seat, you can open it part way before you open the door, and then try to get it completely open before you get soaked. OK, this doesn’t work, either, but it’s about $320,000 cheaper.
Then they showed a new model SUV. Guess which manufacturer is selling it. Take a wild guess. Make it preposterous. . . .
If you guessed "Ferrari," you came close. Maserati. Back when I was a something of a grand prix racing buff (1957–59), the idea that Maserati would someday target soccer moms would not have occurred to me. The thought of either Juan Fangio or Stirling Moss racing at the Targa Florio inside a Maserati SUV makes me giggle.
Can you imagine the repair bills on a Maserati SUV?
The show is nuts. It would make more sense for a Grosse Point matron to buy one of those anorexic outfits shown at a Paris fashion show. What alternative uses for a rich man’s money would be superior to buying one of these cars? Only about 500 immediately come to mind. Just give me a little more time.
I’m not quite at the tail end of the automobile food chain. That honor goes to recent immigrants from Guatemala. But if my spending pattern were to become widespread, the auto industry would go bust. I am not quite a free-rider on the industry, paying nothing, but I am surely a steep discount-rider.
LOSS-LEADERS IN DETROIT
I must admit, the following report from Rick Ackerman's site offers an alternative car-buying strategy for someone who has a General Motors credit card with a pile of rebate points. This story gives you some indication of the desperation in Detroit, due to the recession. What you read here comes from a really dedicated new-car shopper.
"In December I finally got off the fence. GM sent me a voucher for an additional $500 over and above the $3,800 I had still had on my credit card. Further, I noticed that $3,000 rebates were in effect on new 2002 models that needed to be cleared out. In addition there was a $1,000 holiday cash bonus.
"When I got to the first car dealer, on a purely exploratory mission – one of many I have made over the years to no avail – I was told I could get a 2002 Grand Am SE with a sticker price of about $21,000 for $19,500, but since the manager knew I was on my first stop and might be looking around he threw in another $1,000 (of $5,000 factory cash to the dealer) if I took delivery by the Monday following the weekend on which I stopped by. That brought the price to around $18,500, then take away the $3,000 rebate and you get $15,500, less the $1,000 holiday cash and we're down to $14,500. They had to see my voucher to give me the $500 but that got me down to about $14,000 and then my $3,800 credit card rebate points got me down close to $10,000 – less than half the original sticker price (which was a package discount from over $21,500 for the options separately).
"You still had to add back the sales tax (calculated unfortunately on the car price without the rebates) some rust proofing and other protections I chose to have and an extended warranty for about $1,000 (6 years or 72,000 miles) and the final price was about $13,000, but however you figure it I cut over $10,000 off the price of this car and I haven't had a chance to do that for years.
"I think next year we will not see these kinds of bargains, but only time will tell for sure. For now the facts say we have been having deflation in automobile prices. Oh yes, they offered me only $500 for a trade-in, so I kept the old car and am still driving it until the weather gets better and driving the roads around here isn't so much like taking a salt water shower. I guess I am cheap."
This is a man after my own heart.
CONCLUSION
You can save a pile of money by refusing to buy a new car, even at 0% interest. The new car’s depreciation is far more than the interest charge savings.
January 16, 2003
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north154.html
Owners find themselves trapped underwater
Michael and Cynthia Russell wanted to move to New York City, where they both work. Jobs are more plentiful there than in their town of Poughkeepsie, N.Y. But like millions of Americans today, the couple are stuck. They owe about $80,000 more on the home they bought in 2004 than it is now worth.
So instead of selling their home, Cynthia is going to school to become a registered nurse and Michael is working from home.
"We have had to find opportunities closer to home," Michael Russell says. "We actually began trying to refinance in June 2007, but absolutely no one would take us."
It's a problem that's only expected to get worse for legions of homeowners across the USA. Nearly one in seven homeowners is underwater, owing more on their mortgages than their homes are worth. That's about 12 million homeowners, nearly double the number underwater at the end of 2007, according to Moody's Economy.com. Most are homeowners who bought between late 2003 and 2007.
Home prices are projected to drop on average another 10%, bringing to about 14.6 million the number of homeowners who will be underwater on their mortgages by fall 2009, says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. By contrast, about 2.5 million homeowners had negative equity in their homes in 2006.
Increasingly, job seekers find that their homes are albatrosses imperiling their ability to relocate for higher incomes or more secure job opportunities. In fact, the greatest drop in home prices, in many cases, is in areas with the sharpest rise in unemployment.
"It's a pretty alarming trend," says Alan Steel, general manager of AOL Real Estate.
In California, about 18% of homeowners owe more on their first mortgages than their homes are worth. In Florida, it's nearly one in four. Half of homeowners in Louisiana are underwater on their first mortgages.
Paying on 'a lost cause'
Ken Schimpf, 61, a retired carpenter in Lancaster, Calif., briefly toyed with the idea of moving to Wyoming so he could be closer to his oldest son and live in an area where he could find work more easily. But he's trapped by his house.
In August 2005, Ken and his wife, Juli, bought their home in Lancaster for $330,000. It seemed ideal at the time. The 1,900-square-foot, three-bedroom house includes an expansive master suite with a Jacuzzi, a pool, and 2.5-car garage where he keeps a 1923 T-Bucket hot rod that he and his wife worked on.
They got an interest-only loan at 5.25%, with the rate locked in for five years.
But in January 2006, Juli was diagnosed with leukemia. She spent months in and out of the hospital. Ken eventually took a leave of absence from work to help care for her. She died last March. Now Ken is trying to make his mortgage payment of $2,600 a month by relying on his retirement pension of $1,900 a month and savings. He doesn't want to lose the house because it's also home to two adult children: a son who was laid off and a daughter who is working temporary jobs. In September, his mortgage payments will increase by almost $500 a month when the interest-only teaser runs out.
He's selling his hot rod collection, looking for work and fast depleting his savings to make ends meet. Plans to sell the house were thwarted when he discovered the property is worth about $90,000 less than he paid for it. He doesn't want to just walk away from the home because he fears that would devastate his credit.
"I really hate putting the money out each month into what appears to be a lost cause," Schimpf says. "I just hope the economy turns around before too long so people can once again realize that owning a home is the American dream and not the American nightmare."
The inability to relocate because of negative home equity isn't just hurting workers who want to move for better jobs. It's also straining employers. Employees and new hires are increasingly turning down relocation opportunities because of the housing market. A 2008 corporate relocation survey by Atlas Van Lines found that "family ties" was the top reason (62%) cited by companies for workers declining relocations. That was a sharp drop from 84% last year. By contrast, 50% of companies said employees cited "housing and mortgages concerns" as the reason for turning down relocation offers, vs. 30% in 2007.
The dramatic shift is forcing businesses to offer more generous relocation assistance at the same time they're facing significant pressures to curtail costs because of the lackluster economy. In fact, the number of firms offering lump sum payments to transferees and new hires is at the highest in six years.
Some homeowners are so certain that their homes won't appreciate anytime soon that they have pondered simply walking away. Accountant Jason Khan, 33, owes about $80,000 more on his Phoenix home than it's worth in today's market.
"I am not in danger of losing my house. I have no problem paying my mortgage payments," he says in an e-mail. "However, I have considered walking away from my house and buying another … or making late payments to see if my mortgage company will renegotiate my principal with me."
For the most part, lenders will only ease loan terms for homeowners who are at risk of default or foreclosure.
Home prices keep on falling
Economists say a rebound in the housing market is still months away. The drop in home prices has shown no signs of letting up. And at least $500 billion worth of option-ARM loans are expected to reset from mid-2009 through 2012, driving up monthly mortgage payments for homeowners.
That could lead to a wave of new foreclosures that "could drive down home prices and leave more people underwater," Zandi says.
Jim Fawcett of Houston says the 6% decline in his home's value is just enough of a drop to keep him from retiring and moving inland from the coast.
"There's probably no way I could even sell my house in this market — short of giving it away," says Fawcett, 70. "Homes in my area, a newer development, sit on the market for six months, don't sell, then are taken off."
Mara Stefan's house is an unwanted reminder of her life before divorce. "As part of the settlement, I'm stuck in a house I don't want to live in," says Stefan, 42, who works in consumer technology and whose suburban Boston home is $60,000 underwater. She would love to move with her sons, Eric, 15, and Ethan, 6. "But it looks like I'll have to be here awhile."
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/2008-12-18-under-water-late-mortgage_N.htm
Friday, December 19, 2008
Eeyore's News and View
MURRAYVILLE, Georgia (CNN) -- A few weeks before 13-year-old Jonathan King killed himself, he told his parents that his teachers had put him in "time-out."
We thought that meant go sit in the corner and be quiet for a few minutes," Tina King said, tears washing her face as she remembered the child she called "our baby ... a good kid."
But time-out in the boy's north Georgia special education school was spent in something akin to a prison cell -- a concrete room latched from the outside, its tiny window obscured by a piece of paper.
Called a seclusion room, it's where in November 2004, Jonathan hanged himself with a cord a teacher gave him to hold up his pants. Video Watch Jonathan's parents on their son's death »
An attorney representing the school has denied any wrongdoing.
Seclusion rooms, sometimes called time-out rooms, are used across the nation, generally for special needs children. Critics say that along with the death of Jonathan, many mentally disabled and autistic children have been injured or traumatized.
Few states have laws on using seclusion rooms, though 24 states have written guidelines, according to a 2007 study conducted by a Clemson University researcher.
Texas, which was included in that study, has stopped using seclusion and restraint. Georgia has just begun to draft guidelines, four years after Jonathan's death.
Based on conversations with officials in 22 states with written guidelines, seclusion is intended as a last resort when other attempts to calm a child have failed or when a student is hurting himself or others.
Michigan requires that a child held in seclusion have constant supervision from an instructor trained specifically in special education, and that confinement not exceed 15 minutes.
Connecticut education spokesman Tom Murphy said "time-out rooms" were used sparingly and were "usually small rooms with padding on the walls."
Only Vermont tracks how many children are kept in seclusion from year to year, though two other states, Minnesota and New Mexico, say they have been using the rooms less frequently in recent years.
Dr. Veronica Garcia, New Mexico's education secretary, said her state had found more sophisticated and better ways to solve behavior problems. Garcia, whose brother is autistic, said, "The idea of confining a child in a room repeatedly and as punishment, that's an ethics violation I would never tolerate."
But researchers say that the rooms, in some cases, are being misused and that children are suffering.
Public schools in the United States are now educating more than half a million more students with disabilities than they did a decade ago, according to the National Education Association.
"Teachers aren't trained to handle that," said Dr. Roger Pierangelo, executive director of the National Association of Special Education Teachers.
"When you have an out-of-control student threatening your class -- it's not right and it can be very damaging -- but seclusion is used as a 'quick fix' in many cases."
Former Rhode Island special education superintendent Leslie Ryan told CNN that she thought she was helping a disabled fifth-grader by keeping him in a "chill room" in the basement of a public elementary school that was later deemed a fire hazard.
"All I know is I tried to help this boy, and I had very few options," Ryan said. After the public learned of the room, she resigned from her post with the department but remains with the school.
School records do not indicate why Jonathan King was repeatedly confined to the concrete room or what, if any, positive outcome was expected.
His parents say they don't recognize the boy described in records as one who liked to kick and punch his classmates. They have launched a wrongful death lawsuit against the school -- the Alpine Program in Gainesville -- which has denied any wrongdoing. A Georgia judge is expected to rule soon on whether the case can be brought before a jury.
Jonathan's parents say the boy had been diagnosed since kindergarten with severe depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. But his father remembers him as a boy who was happy when he sang in the church choir.
"He was a hugger, liked to go fishing with me and run after me saying, 'Daddy, when are we going to the lake?' " Don King said.
King said that he wanted to know if there were similar situations in other schools and that critics of seclusion rooms fear there could be.
"Jonathan's case is the worst of the worst, but it should be a warning. It's reasonable to think that it could happen in all the other schools that use seclusion on disabled children -- largely because the use of seclusion goes so unchecked," said Jane Hudson, an attorney with the National Disability Rights Network.
"This is one of those most unregulated, unresearched areas I've come across," said Joseph Ryan, a Clemson University special education researcher who has worked in schools for disabled kids and co-authored a study on the use of seclusion.
"You have very little oversight in schools of these rooms -- first because the general public doesn't really even know they exist," he said.
There is no national database tracking seclusion incidents in schools, though many have been described in media reports, lawsuits, disability advocacy groups' investigations and on blogs catering to parents who say their child had been held in seclusion.
Disability Rights California, a federally funded watchdog group, found that teachers dragged children into seclusion rooms they could not leave. In one case, they found a retarded 8-year-old had been locked alone in a seclusion room in a northeast California elementary school for at least 31 days in a year.
"What we found outrageous was that we went to the schools and asked to see the rooms and were denied," said Leslie Morrison, a psychiatric nurse and attorney who led the 2007 investigation that substantiated at least six cases of abuse involving seclusion in public schools.
"It took a lot of fighting to eventually get in to see where these children were held."
CNN asked every school official interviewed if a reporter could visit a seclusion room and was denied every time.
In other instances of alleged abuse:
• A Tennessee mother alleged in a federal suit against the Learn Center in Clinton that her 51-pound 9-year-old autistic son was bruised when school instructors used their body weight on his legs and torso to hold him down before putting him in a "quiet room" for four hours. Principal Gary Houck of the Learn Center, which serves disabled children, said lawyers have advised him not to discuss the case.
• Eight-year-old Isabel Loeffler, who has autism, was held down by her teachers and confined in a storage closet where she pulled out her hair and wet her pants at her Dallas County, Iowa, elementary school. Last year, a judge found that the school had violated the girl's rights. "What we're talking about is trauma," said her father, Doug Loeffler. "She spent hours in wet clothes, crying to be let out." Waukee school district attorney Matt Novak told CNN that the school has denied any wrongdoing.
• A mentally retarded 14-year-old in Killeen, Texas, died from his teachers pressing on his chest in an effort to restrain him in 2001. Texas passed a law to limit both restraint and seclusion in schools because the two methods are often used together.
Federal law requires that schools develop behavioral plans for students with disabilities. These plans are supposed to explicitly explain behavior problems and methods the teacher is allowed to use to stop it, including using music to calm a child or allowing a student to take a break from schoolwork.
A behavioral plan for Jonathan King, provided to CNN by the Kings' attorney, shows that Jonathan was confined in the seclusion room on 15 separate days for infractions ranging from cursing and threatening other students to physically striking classmates.
Howard "Sandy" Addis, the director of the Pioneer education agency which oversees Alpine, said that the room where Jonathan died is no longer in use. Citing the ongoing litigation, he declined to answer questions about the King case but defended the use of seclusion for "an emergency safety situation."
The Alpine Program's attorney, Phil Hartley, said Jonathan's actions leading up to his suicide did not suggest the boy was "serious" about killing himself. Jonathan's actions were an "effort to get attention," Hartley said.
"This is a program designed for students with severe emotional disabilities and problems," he said. "It is a program which frequently deals with students who use various methods of getting attention, avoiding work."
A substitute employee placed in charge of watching the room on the day Jonathan died said in an affidavit that he had no training in the use of seclusion, and didn't know Jonathan had threatened suicide weeks earlier.
advertisement
The Kings say they would have removed their son from the school if they knew he was being held in seclusion, or that he had expressed a desire to hurt himself.
"We would have home schooled him or taken him to another psychologist," said Don King. "If we would have known, our boy would have never been in that room. He would still be alive."
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/12/17/seclusion.rooms/index.html
Gun-toting woman divides community
By Kathy Boccella
Inquirer Staff Writer
LEBANON, Pa. - Before heading out the door to go to Wal-Mart, Meleanie Hain fussed over her children, grabbed her coat and keys, then ran upstairs to get one more item: her loaded Glock 26, which she strapped to her hip.
She never leaves home without it.
Hain, 30, has caused a stir in this rural Pennsylvania Dutch community 25 miles east of Harrisburg for packing a gun everywhere she goes, including to her 5-year-old daughter's soccer games this fall.
She's paid a big price for sticking to her gun.
The mother of four, who often carries a baby on one hip and her Glock on the other, has been criticized by even the most ardent gun-lovers. From once-friendly neighbors to the local police chief, the general feeling is that Hain's pistol-packing behavior is, well, extreme.
"People get alarmed because they don't see that too often," said Charlie Jones, a soccer coach who confronted Hain about the gun at a Sept. 11 game. "They don't know what your intentions are going to be."
Hain said the outcry has hurt her babysitting business and left her feeling isolated. She has been called an attention-seeker, psycho, moron and worse on hundreds of pages on Internet forums. Neighbors have blasted her on radio shows, her daughter's principal warned her against taking the gun to school (she doesn't), and the local police chief advised her to put it away.
Now she is firing back. On Oct. 24, Hain filed a federal lawsuit against Lebanon County and Mike DeLeo, the sheriff who revoked her gun permit after jittery parents complained about her at the Sept. 11 game.
The suit says they violated her constitutional and civil rights and seeks more than $1 million.
"The sheriff got on TV after the hearing and said, 'I stand by my decision,' " said Hain, who grew up in Lancaster County in a family that did not own guns. "That comment makes people think I'm still an idiot and what he did was right."
DeLeo, who calls himself a staunch NRA member, said he has nothing against guns but felt it was his duty to take action "because of the safety and security issues involving [children] on the field."
Last week, the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence offered to defend DeLeo and the county for free.
"This is a case that calls out for common sense and sanity," said Daniel Vice, the center's senior attorney. "It's an incredible risk to bring a loaded semi-automatic weapon to a children's soccer game."
No one disputes Hain's right to own a gun. Many of her critics are hunters. But they say that packing heat at a soccer game - or anywhere else around children - is dangerous and foolhardy.
In Pennsylvania, gun owners are allowed to carry weapons in the open as Hain does, but need a permit to conceal them in a pocket, purse or car. So without a permit, Hain could still carry a gun at the game but couldn't take it in the car to get there.
Even Judge Robert J. Eby, who restored her permit on Oct. 14, said he thought she lacked good judgment and common sense.
"You scared the devil out of some other people," Eby said.
He chided her for causing anxiety and apprehension in other people and said he didn't think anyone needed gun protection at a 5-year-old's soccer game. Concealing it "would be the right thing to do," he said.
Hain, who has children ages 1, 5 and 9 and a 9-year-old stepdaughter, says a near-fatal car accident 21/2 years ago destroyed her sense of security and convinced her that the worst can happen.
"I thought, 'What more can I do to ensure the safety of myself and my children?' " she said. "It's not a matter of being paranoid. People have smoke detectors and fire extinguishers in their homes. They're not paranoid; they're prepared."
Articulate and well-versed in gun laws, she is a vegetarian and Krishna follower with a Sanskrit symbol tattooed on her forearm, though she calls herself a "pseudo-devotee." Her husband, who taught her to shoot, works in law enforcement but stays out of the fray, fearing it will cost him his job. She won't say where he works and in fact, he sat in his car while a reporter and photographer were in his house with Hain.
Her babysitting business has suffered. Two babysitting clients have fled and she is down to just one family. Michael Long - who leaves Tyler, 2, and Joshawa, 8, with Hain one day a week - said he doesn't worry because she locks up her gun when the children are in the house.
"I can see where she's coming from," he said, scooping up Tyler in Hain's living room, which was filled with toys. In a large crate in the kitchen was Ghost, an enormous bull mastiff.
Others, though, say they can't understand why she feels so threatened.
"I said, 'Kids are more in danger of falling off a piece of playground equipment or getting hit by a car in the parking lot than anybody coming and doing anything where you need a gun to defend yourself,' " Jones said.
But Hain sees danger lurking around every corner.
She carries the weapon cowboy-style because in an emergency - not that there has ever been one - "I don't really need anything extra in the way of the gun if I'm going to have to pull it out and I'm holding a baby and trying to shuttle two or three other kids," she said.
And she doesn't want to have to wait for help to arrive. "When seconds count," she said, "the police are minutes away."
DeLeo said he had rarely seen anyone other than a police officer walk around with a gun on the hip. In fact, doing so might make Hain more of a target, he said.
"If you carry it open, you already lost the element of surprise," he said.
Moreover, it increases the change of accidental shootings, Vice of the Brady Center said. And a child could easily grab it.
"Semiautomatic weapons are made so that even young children can fire them," he said.
At Wal-Mart, Hain zipped through the aisles like any other busy mother, except she had a Glock on her hip instead of a cell phone. The last time she was in the store, a woman complained about the gun to a manager who asked Hain to leave. She explained that she was legally entitled to carry the gun and marched back into the store.
On this trip, few people seemed to notice the gun as she filled her cart with Pokémon cards, jeans and diapers. Then in the milk aisle, a man and woman approached.
"Thank you for standing up for yourself," said John Stegall, who said he recognized her from the newspaper.
After they left, Hain, ever vigilant, said she had noticed them looking at her and wondered whether they were going to cause trouble.
"People who carry pay a lot of attention to what's going on around them," she said.
Hain has thought about becoming a cop, but friends told her that nobody would hire her because "she makes waves," she said.
But as she checked out, a young cashier asked whether she was a police officer.
"No, it's for self-defense," she said as she loaded her cart. "Do you know how many crimes have taken place in Wal-Mart parking lots?"
http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_up ... ?viewAll=y
Israel: Iran could attack US with nuclear bomb
Israel has warned that Iran could try to attack the US if it acquired a nuclear weapon.
By Our Foreign Staff
Last Updated: 8:19PM GMT 17 Dec 2008
Ehud Barak, the Israeli defence minister, appealed to world leaders to act now to prevent Iran from continuing its nuclear programme.
"If it built even a primitive nuclear weapon like the type that destroyed Hiroshima, Iran would not hesitate to load it on a ship, arm it with a detonator operated by GPS and sail it into a vital port on the east coast of North America," Mr Barak told a conference of the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University.
Indicating the possibility of an Israeli military strike on Iran, Mr Barak said: "We are not taking any option off the table, and we recommend to the world not to take any option off the table, and we mean what we say."
His comments came as a Russian news agency reported that the Kremlin had confirmed that it will deliver a new air defence system to Iran. The Russian foreign ministry denied reports of the deal in October.
But it is now believed to be implementing the deal, which will see Russia deliver an S300 system to the Islamic republic to help it fend off possible air strikes on its nuclear sites by Israel or the US.
The most advanced version of the S-300 system can track targets and fire at aircraft 75 miles away. It is known in the West as the SA20.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -bomb.html
Crude plunges as economy struggles, spending falls
Oil continued its downward march Thursday as mass layoffs pushed the U.S. economy deeper into recession, signaling a drastic pullback on energy spending.
Light, sweet crude for January delivery, fell 9%, or $3.84, to settle at $36.22 a barrel after dropping as low as $35.98, levels last seen in June 2004. The January contract closes on Friday. Light, sweet crude for February delivery fell $2.94 to settle at $41.67.
There is no demand for oil right now, said analyst Peter Beutel of Cameron Hanover.
Higher prices for the February contract suggest that oil brokers and traders believe OPEC's unprecedented 2.2 million-barrel daily production cut, announced Wednesday, will tighten supply. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries had already taken 2 million barrels of oil out of production, bringing total cuts to more than 4 million barrels per day.
"The market is saying OPEC cuts will have an impact but just not right away," he said.
Analyst and trader Stephen Schork said, "The only people still holding on to January contracts are those who made the assumption that $40 per barrel would hold. Those people are losing their shirts."
Schork said crude prices have further to fall.
Economic data continue to paint a dire situation in the U.S., Europe and Asia.
The U.S. Labor Department reported Thursday that new applications for jobless benefits fell to a seasonally adjusted 554,000 for the week ended Dec. 13, from an upwardly revised figure of 575,000 the previous week.
Still, the four-week moving average, which smooths out fluctuations, increased slightly to 543,750 claims, the highest since December 1982. The labor force has grown by about half since then.
Large layoffs are occurring across many sectors of the economy. On Wednesday alone, hard drive maker Western Digital, managed-care company Aetna and Newell Rubbermaid, maker of products including Rubbermaid storage containers and Sharpie pens, announced mass job cuts.
Pharmaceutical company Bristol-Myers Squibb, International Paper and Bank of America also announced layoffs in the past week.
On Thursday, the Conference Board, a private research group, said its index of leading economic indicators fell 0.4% in November. The index is meant to forecast economic activity in the next three to six months. It has dropped 2.8% in the six months through November, the worst decline since 1991.
As companies and consumers spend less, analysts continue to whittle away energy demand expectations.
JPMorgan on Thursday cut its 2009 price target for oil to $43 a barrel from $69, citing "ongoing deterioration in the world economic environment and the ensuing sharp contraction in global oil demand in both 2008 and 2009."
Oil prices have tumbled 73% since July. What started as a crisis in the U.S. subprime mortgage sector last year has mushroomed into a recession in most developed countries and a sharp downturn in emerging nations.
Actions by OPEC and tumbling fuel prices have failed to stimulate demand.
"OPEC is virtually powerless right now," said Jim Ritterbusch, president of Ritterbusch and Association. "They'll simply have to be patient and wait for some semblance of demand improvement."
Beutel said it could be several more months before there is a response to lower prices.
This week's dive in oil prices comes as the dollar weakens against the euro, which peaked at $1.4719 in overnight trading, its highest point since late September.
Typically, a weaker dollar sends investors scurrying into the oil markets because crude is bought and sold in U.S. currency. That is what happened as prices made their historic run at $150 over the summer.
The severe drop-off in demand, however has scuttled almost all of the rules that traditionally govern trade in oil, as the OPEC production cuts show.
Retail gasoline prices fell for 86 straight days, until Friday.
Retail gas prices, which hit a low of $1.656 a gallon on Friday, rose 0.3 cents to $1.67 a gallon Thursday, according to auto club AAA, the Oil Price Information Service and Wright Express. It is the third consecutive day of price increases, but is still down from $2.068 a month ago and $2.99 a year ago.
China on Thursday cut prices for gasoline, diesel and jet fuel as the government tries to revive economic growth.
The price of diesel is being cut 18% while the price of gasoline will fall by 13.8%, effective Friday, according to the country's planning agency, the Cabinet's National Development and Reform Commission. Jet fuel prices will fall by 32%.
The cuts will help trucking companies, airlines, factories and others that are being squeezed by high fuel prices and a slump in sales.
The U.S. Department of Energy on Thursday said natural gas storage levels in the U.S. tumbled much more than expected last week and continue to remain below year-ago levels.
The Energy Information Administration said in its weekly report that natural gas inventories held in underground storage in the lower 48 states fell by 124 billion cubic feet to about 3.17 trillion cubic feet for the week ended Friday.
Analysts had expected a drop of between 107 billion to 112 billion cubic feet, according to a survey by Platts, the energy information arm of McGraw-Hill Cos.
In other Nymex trading, gasoline futures fell 4.26 cents to 96.3 cents a gallon. Heating oil fell 6.96 cents to $1.3729 a gallon while natural gas for January delivery fell 7 cents to settle at $5.548 per 1,000 cubic feet.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2008-12-18-oil-thursday_N.htm
Good, wish they had asked mr to help
Iraqi judge: Shoe-tossing reporter was beaten December 19, 2008 - 7:38am
By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA Associated Press Writer
BAGHDAD (AP) - The Iraqi journalist who threw his shoes at President George W. Bush during a news conference was beaten afterward and had bruises on his face and around his eyes, a judge said Friday.
Judge Dhia al-Kinani, the magistrate investigating the incident, said the court has opened an investigation into the alleged beating of journalist Muntadhar al-Zeidi.
Al-Zeidi was wrestled to the ground after throwing his shoes during the news conference Sunday by Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, and there has been conflicting claims on his condition since then. One of his brothers said he was harshly beaten, but another said he seemed to be in good condition.
Al-Zeidi "was beaten in the news conference and we will watch the tape and write an official letter asking for the names of those who assaulted him," the judge told The Associated Press. "Al-Zeidi has the right to drop this case."
The journalist was in custody and was expected to eventually face charges of insulting a foreign leader. A conviction could bring a sentence of two years in prison.
Al-Kinani also confirmed that the journalist had written a letter of apology to al-Maliki. Iraq's president can grant pardons that are requested by the prime minister, but the judge said such a pardon can be issued only after a conviction.
He added that he could not drop the case even though neither Bush nor al-Maliki had complained. "This case was filed because of an article in the law concerning the protection of the respect of sovereignity," he said.
A spokesman for al-Maliki said Thursday that the letter contained a specific pardon request. But al-Zeidi's brother Dhargham told The AP that he suspected the letter was a forgery.
The incident, a vivid demonstration of Iraqis' dismay over the U.S.-led invasion and occupation of the country for more than five years, turned al-Zeidi into an instant folk hero. Thousands of Iraqis have demonstrated for his release.
The judge said the investigation would be completed and sent to the criminal court on Sunday, after which a court date would be set within seven to 10 days.
Al-Zeidi's action was broadcast repeatedly on television stations around the world. U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack suggested that worldwide attention to the shoe-tossing was overblown.
"We would hope that the fact of a U.S. president standing next to a freely elected prime minister of Iraq who just happens to be Shia, who is governing in a multi-confessional, multiethnic democracy in the heart of the Middle East, is not overshadowed by one incident like this," McCormack told reporters in Washington.
McCormack said he believed that in the coming years "the fact of the president making that visit under those circumstances will probably overshadow any memory of this particular gentleman and what he did."
In the Iranian capital Tehran, hard-line Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati praised the act at Friday prayers, calling it the "Shoe Intifadha."
Jannati proposed people in Iraq and Iran should carry shoes in further anti-American demonstrations. "This should be a role model," said Jannati.
Also Friday, the head of a large West Bank family said it is willing to offer one of its eligible females as a bride for al-Zeidi. The leader, 75-year-old Ahmad Salim Judeh, said that the 500-member clan had raised $30,000 for al-Zeidi's legal defense.
http://wtop.com/?nid=500&sid=1550024
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Eeyore's News and View
Proposed anti-picketing bill in D.C. riles unions, ACLU
By Michael Neibauer
Examiner Staff Writer 12/15/08
A D.C. Council member is mulling emergency legislation that would bar demonstrations outside homes in residential neighborhoods, a response to increasingly aggressive protests by an extremist animal rights group.
Ward 3 Councilwoman Mary Cheh has submitted written notice that she will introduce the Residential Tranquility Emergency Amendment Act during the council’s final legislative meeting of the year. Cheh, a constitutional law professor, contends the group Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty has harassed numerous D.C. residents in their homes — shouting obscenities, yelling death threats, banging on doors.
The legislation, at least one draft of which was obtained by The Examiner, would make it a misdemeanor “for any person to repeatedly engage in unwanted targeted picketing before or about an individual’s dwelling place in a residential neighborhood with the intent to intimidate, threaten, abuse, annoy, or harass the individual.” Picketing under the measure is defined as “marching, congregating, standing, parading, demonstrating or patrolling … without the implied or express consent of the occupant.”
Cheh said Friday she had not committed to a version, or any bill at all.
“Nobody believes in free speech more than I do,” she said. “But there has to be a line here and I’m just trying to figure out what it is.”
The bill drew immediate repudiation from labor groups and the American Civil Liberties Union. It may have been inspired by one group, but the legislation is certain to affect unions and other organizations that use picketing as a means of getting their message across, said Johnny Barnes, executive director of the ACLU’s national capital-area chapter.
“The best answer to speech you don’t like is more speech, good speech,” Barnes said Friday. “When you limit speech, it becomes very dangerous.”
Similar anti-picketing laws have withstood U.S. Supreme Court scrutiny. The First Amendment “permits the government to prohibit offensive speech as intrusive when the ‘captive’ audience cannot avoid the objectionable speech,” Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in 1988, in the majority opinion of Frisby v. Schultz.
Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty is behind a global campaign against Huntingdon Life Sciences, a British-based business that tests drugs on roughly 70,000 animals a year. The Southern Poverty Law Center has described SHAC members as radicals who employ “frankly terroristic tactics similar to those of anti-abortion extremists.”
Attempts to locate a contact for Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty were unsuccessful.
This is the second protest-related bill that Cheh has backed this year. Watered-down noise restrictions approved in June restrict daytime noncommercial speech in residential neighborhoods to no more than 80 decibels when measured from inside the nearest occupied home.
http://www.dcexaminer.com/local/121508- ... _ACLU.html
Alternative Currencies Grow in Popularity
By Judith D. Schwartz Sunday, Dec. 14, 2008
Most of us take for granted that those rectangular green slips of paper we keep in our wallets are inviolable: the physical embodiment of value. But alternative forms of money have a long history and appear to be growing in popularity. It's not merely barter or primitive means of exchange like seashells or beads. Beneath the financial radar, in hip U.S. towns or South African townships, in shops, markets and even banks, people throughout the world are exchanging goods and services via thousands of currency types that look nothing like official tender.
Alternative means of trade often surface during tough economic times. "When money gets dried up and there are still needs to be met in society, people come up with creative ways to meet those needs," says Peter North, a senior lecturer in geography at the University of Liverpool and the author of two books on the subject. He refers to the "scrips" issued in the U.S. and Europe during the Great Depression that kept money flowing and the massive barter exchanges involving millions of people that emerged amid runaway inflation in Argentina in 2000. "People were kept from starving [this way]," he says. (Find out 10 things to do with your money.)
Closer to home, "Ithaca Hours," with a livable hourly wage as the standard, were launched during the 1991 recession to sustain the economy in Ithaca, N.Y., and stem the loss of jobs. Hours, which are legal and taxable, circulate within the community, moving from local shop to local artisan and back, rather than leaking out into the larger monetary system. The logo on the Hour reads "In Ithaca We Trust."
Alternative (or "complementary") currencies range from quaint to robust, simple to high tech. There are Greens from the Lettuce Patch Bank at the Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage in rural northeastern Missouri. In western Massachusetts one finds fine-artist-designed BerkShares, which are convertible to U.S. dollars. More than $2 million in BerkShares have been issued through the 12 branches of five local banks, according to Susan Witt, executive director of the E.F. Schumacher Society, the nonprofit behind the currency. And in South Africa, proprietary software keeps track of Community Exchange System (CES) Talents; one ambitious plan is to make Khayelitsha, a vast, desolate township of perhaps 1 million inhabitants near Cape Town, a self-sustaining community.
An alternative currency is generally used in conjunction with conventional money; one may use local currency at the farmers' market and regular greenbacks at the supermarket. "It doesn't try in any way to replace cash," says Christoph Hensch, a Swiss national and former banker living in Christchurch, New Zealand. Rather, it offers a way "for people to share and redeem value they have in the community." He says the currencies are most useful in geographical areas or social sectors where money doesn't flow sufficiently, citing, for example, New Zealand's Golden Bay, which is so remote that it sometimes nearly functions as its own economy.
Advocates of alternative currencies say they are a means of empowerment for those languishing on the margins of fiscal life, granting economic agency to people like the elderly, the disabled or the underemployed, who have little opportunity to earn money. For example, in some systems one can "bank" Time Dollars for tasks like child care and changing motor oil. It's not whether you're employed or what financial assets you have that matter, says Les Squires, a consultant on social-networking software who has been working with groups developing alternative currencies. Each person has "value" that is "exchangeable" on the basis of time spent or a given task.
Alternative currency comes in many forms. In addition to time-banking, there are Local Exchange Trading Systems (LETS), systems of mutual credit that vary by location. This model was developed by Michael Linton in Canada, though it seems to have taken off mostly in the British Isles; an estimated 40,000 people in the U.K. use these for at least some transactions. (See TIME's top 10 everything of 2008.)
Similarly, the CES is an online money and banking system and trading marketplace that tracks credits and debits. While LETS function as clubs that set their own guidelines, CES is administered through an online program that connects local groups to create a global network. The CES website points to more than 100 exchanges in 15 countries. Squires says the Internet has made alternative forms of exchange more viable, as databases can keep account of credits. In the rarefied world of monetary theory, think tanks are abuzz with ideas about future forms of money. One visionary, Jean-Francois Noubel, co-founder of AOL-France, foresees "millions of free currencies circulating on the Net and through our cell phones" as money follows the distribution path that media have over the past decade. Bernard Lietaer, a Belgian economist and author who helped develop the euro, has proposed the Terra, a transnational currency backed by established commodities that would coexist with conventional notes, the monetary equivalent of Esperanto.
In recent years, the impetus for alternative currencies in established economies has stemmed in part from localization movements. Periodically ditching the dollar (or the pound or the yen) in favor of homegrown currency doesn't merely fortify the local economy; it also builds community. People have a stake in their neighbor's well-being because that neighbor represents both market and supply chain. Some argue that such transactions are more secure than others because knowing the person you're dealing with, and his family and friends, serves as a kind of social collateral.
The use of BerkShares has helped solidify local ties, says Witt. "It's cash, so you have to pay your bills by walking into the store or dentist's office." Local pride does have its challenges, however. In September the town of Lewes in Sussex, England, issued the Lewes Pound — complete with a special-edition beer from Harvey's, a local brewery, to celebrate the introduction. There was an immediate run on the currency, limiting its circulation; Lewes Pounds were going for 35 pounds sterling on eBay. The organizers quickly went back to press and dealt with the situation. As Witt is the first to say, "Local currencies are not easy."
Some are moved to create currencies for environmental reasons: they minimize the use of energy. With diminishing oil supplies, "we will not be able to move goods around the world as cheaply," says North. One strategy, he says, is to produce more locally, and a way to facilitate that is through local currency. This was one inspiration for the Lewes Pound and for the Totnes Pound in Devon, England. Both towns are part of the Transition Town movement, which seeks creative, upbeat, community-based approaches to dealing with climate change and diminished oil reserves.
Paper-money currencies, like BerkShares or the Lewes or Totnes Pound, slip fairly seamlessly into the national economy; their use is taxed like ordinary money. More abstract exchanges are a bit more complicated to deal with. But the tax concern is not insurmountable. "If you use local currency for your main income-generating activity, you must pay income tax," says Hensch, who consults in complementary currencies. Likewise, if you have a business, you'll pay sales tax on any local currency — in New Zealand, that would be Green Dollars, part of LETS — you bring in. But if you trade in "neighborhood help," like lawn-mowing, that would not be taxed.
The rules vary from country to country. In the U.S., any business transaction must be recorded and reported to the IRS; tax levies apply as if the trade were made in cash. As Squires puts it, professional services are subject to income tax, but for noncommercial transactions, barter rules hold. "If I bake a cake for you, that's not a taxable event," he says.
Andrew Rose, Bernard T. Rocca Professor of International Trade at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley, sees local currencies as limited by their unwieldiness. "Money is primarily just a convenience for enabling exchanges between two parties. The more widely accepted, the more convenient it is," he says. If you need to use different currencies in different locations, the money then becomes less convenient.
Do large financial institutions have anything to fear from the use of alternative currencies? Not at all, says Rose. "It's got to be so tiny. It has no effect at all," he says. Besides, he notes, the Fed doesn't care about currency or even the number of bills circulating in the economy. "The Fed cares about monetary policy and deal[s] with that in different ways."
http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0%2C8599%2C1865467%2C00.html?xid=feed-yahoo-biztech
National Guard Take Control of City Jail
Celling point: Indiana National Guard would take old Warrick jail off town’s hands
Lydia X. McCoy
Courier Press
December 13, 2008
BOONVILLE, Ind. — The inmates of the old Warrick County Jail are long gone, but the steel bars that held them remain.
But, with hope, not for much longer.
After about a year of talks, Warrick County officials are trying to seal a deal to give the cells to the Muscatatuck Urban Training Center in Butlerville, Ind.
While the cells haven't been used for a number of years, the rest of the building currently is occupied by the Warrick County EMS.
The compound, the only one of its kind in the United States, is a secluded, self-contained community, once home to the Muscatatuck State Developmental Center. The 1,000-acre site was turned over to the Indiana National Guard in July 2005 and has been evolving into a full-immersion contemporary urban training environment.
Lt. Col. Chris Kelsey, site manager for Muscatatuck, said the National Guard wants to use the cells for a prison at the training center.
"We want an actual prison; the more realistic the better," he said. "We can do the real thing or a replication. We're trying to provide the real thing."
The cells at the "old jail" in Warrick County would help the training center in that goal.
On Thursday, 1st Lt. Michael Brandt and three other soldiers visited Boonville to examine the cells and determine the best way to move them.
"Today, I brought some of the actual engineers in who would be working on and supervising the project," he said.
Brandt said the visit would help the engineers — Sgt. Tim Hadley, Staff Sgt. Ryan Wenk and 1st Lt. Richard Hoover — determine what they will need to disassemble the cells.
"(So) when we come up, we're equipped to basically dismantle and haul out the jail cells ourselves, with just Army labor at no cost to the county," he said. "It's kind of a win-win. We help them out by taking out this, giving them a usable bay again, and they help us out by supplying us with stuff we're actually looking for and trying to find.
"That's the great thing of how we're able to work with local governments to get stuff like this. It enhances the realism if we can get some (things) that's actually been used.
"The artwork on some of these cells that the inmates have drawn is great. We'll leave that intact, so when we put it back up, it'll actually look like it's been occupied."
Brandt said if the deal is finalized, he'd like to start disassembling the cells by mid-January and have everything completed in about a month.
County officials have been trying to figure out a way to remove the cells since spring. They did a bid process but decided to look for alternatives when the prices were higher than anticipated, said the county's purchasing manager, Joe Grassman.
Then, Grassman was contacted by Muscatatuck about the cells. Grassman said he's "pretty optimistic" that the deal will go through.
And he agrees that it's a win-win situation.
"The most important thing is that they will be used for training ... instead of becoming scrap metal. They'll reconstruct them and they'll serve a purpose," Grassman said.
"It will save Warrick County a ton of money. It's just one of those win-win situations."
The Warrick County Commissioners will decide what to do with the space.
Don Williams, commissioners president, said two options are being considered. Either use it to store ambulances for Warrick EMS or use it to store county records.
http://www.courierpress.com/news/2008/d ... ing-point/
http://www.mutc.in.ng.mil/
Supermarket defends itself over Adolf Hitler cake
December 17, 2008 - 6:11pmEASTON, Pa. (AP) - A supermarket is defending itself for refusing to a write out 3-year-old Adolf Hitler Campbell's name on his birthday cake. Deborah Campbell, 25, of nearby Hunterdon County, N.J., said she phoned in her order last week to the Greenwich ShopRite. When she told the bakery department she wanted her son's name spelled out, she was told to talk to a supervisor, who denied the request.
Karen Meleta, a ShopRite spokeswoman, said the store denied similar requests from the Campbells the last two years, including a request for a swastika.
"We reserve the right not to print anything on the cake that we deem to be inappropriate," Meleta said. "We considered this inappropriate."
The Campbells ultimately got their cake decorated at a Wal-Mart in Pennsylvania, Deborah Campbell said Tuesday.
A Wal-Mart spokesman told The Associated Press on Wednesday that in light of the incident, the company would review its guidelines regarding cake decorations and other requests.
"It's clear that in serving this customer, some people were offended," spokesman Greg Rossiter said. "As a result, we're going to review our policies."
Heath Campbell said he named his son after Adolf Hitler because he liked the name and because "no one else in the world would have that name."
The Campbells' two other children are named JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell, who turns 2 in a few months, and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell, who will be 1 in April.
Campbell said he was raised not to avoid people of other races but not to mix with them socially or romantically. But he said he would try to raise his children differently.
"Say he grows up and hangs out with black people. That's fine, I don't really care," he said. "That's his choice."
He said about 12 people attended the birthday party Sunday, including several children of mixed race.
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=456&sid=1551680
Oil tumbles despite OPEC's record cut in production
WASHINGTON — Oil prices plunged to the lowest level in 4½ years Wednesday as gloomy prospects for energy demand in the slumping world economy overshadowed a record cut in OPEC's production target.
The price of a barrel of light, sweet crude oil trading for delivery in January fell $3.54, or 8.1%, to $40.06, the lowest since July 2004. Oil prices are down more than $100 since peaking in July.
The decline Wednesday came even after the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries said it's cutting production 2.2 million barrels a day starting Jan. 1 in a bid to prop up prices. That is on top of the 2 million barrels the cartel pledged to cut in previous months and brings OPEC's daily production target to 24.8 million, the lowest in 4½ years.
OPEC said supply is exceeding demand. The cartel said prices threatened to get so low that it would no longer make sense to make investments to ensure enough supply in the long run.
OPEC President Chakib Khelil, Algeria's energy head, suggested the cartel could cut again before its next regularly scheduled meeting in March. "We are in a very, very deteriorating environment," he said at a news conference broadcast over the Internet.
But Bruce Bullock, director of the Maguire Energy Institute at Southern Methodist University, says further cuts might not work. Investors don't take OPEC's announcements seriously because members often produce more than promised, he says. More important, the economy is slipping too quickly for even OPEC to influence prices.
"The overall global economic challenges are such an overhang on this market right now that there's not a whole lot they can do to stimulate the market until we see the demand side pick up again," Bullock says.
OPEC's cut is "short-sighted," Energy Department press secretary Healy Baumgardner says.
The Energy Information Administration forecast U.S. oil consumption will fall through 2010.
In the USA, drivers are using less gasoline even though the price at the pump has plunged. Demand for gasoline in the four-week period ended Dec. 12 was down 3.5% from a year earlier, EIA said.
The nationwide average for a gallon of regular gas is $1.667, according to AAA and the Oil Price Information Service.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2008-12-17-opec-oil-cut_N.htm